几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wind load on an open structure

wind load on an open structure
i am currently looking at an open structure for a project. the problem i am having is with the h/l ratio. per asce 7-05, figure 6-18b, the minimum h/l ratio is 0.25. my structure has an h/l ratio of approximately 0.16.
i looked through the asce 7, and did not find an alternative way to determine the wind loads for the building.
i am considering just ignoring the ratio and proceeding with the analysis, but i was wondering if anyone knew of a "legal" alternate way of doing this analysis, or any other suggestions on this matter.
thanks
that's a good one. the values are based on wind tunnel testing, so there's really no way to quantify what the effect would be.
for a very squat building, there might be some addtional pressures from the wind entering and leaving the open sides. it would be very conservative to assume the ends are solid and add those forces to the figure 18b forces if that doesn't greatly change your design.
well...i should have been a little clearer on my first post. my structure is a prefab metal building which will serve as an overhead cover for fish hatcheries. all sides are open, the roof has a 4/12 pitch, a 152' span, and a 13' eave height. basically this results in a h/l ratio of about 0.16.
what is frustrating is the asce 7-05 gives no parameters of what to do when you don't meet the minimum or maximum h/l.
i'd use the same parameters for the upward/downward roof forces and add in the horizontal force as if the sides were solid. i don't think the roof forces will increase, but the wind trying to squeeze past that 13 ft eave might create a horizontal force.
as far as asce 7 not having any parameters for your case, you've got to admit it's somewhat unusual.
depending on how you finish the ceiling, open walls could create some interesting effects on vertical pressure. the national building code of canada (nbc) has a number of coefficients listed for a variety of roof shapes.
i do not know what "h" is in your code, but if h/l is about 0.16, i am guessing that "h" is either the height of the sloping roof or the vertical distance from the ground to the middle of the slope.
if you are interested, i could send you some material from the nbc.
best regards,
ba
what are the dimensions of your building.
for all intensive purposes, this could be considered an agricultural building, therefore, no "finishes" to really speak of.
the 'h' dimension, per asce 7, is the mean roof height...the average of the dimension between the eave height and the top of the peak.
the plan dimensions of the building are 152'x 354'. the eave height is 13' with a gable roof slope of 4/12.
i'm sorry rwpe, i just can't help it. the phrase is "for all intents and purposes."
in the nbc, "h" is called "reference height" and is defined the same way, i.e. mid-height of sloping roof. the only way it enters the calculation is its effect on the exposure factor, ce. if the building is in open terrain, ce is defined as (h/10)^0.2 where h is in meters.
in your case, h = 13 + 152/12 = 25.7' or 7.82m, giving a value of ce of 0.952, close enough to 1.0.
hope that helps.
best regards,
ba
i suggest you treat this structure as a hybrid.
use 16-8b for 26' at the eaves and 6-11d for the middle 100 ft.
the rational behind this approach is that the greatest turbulence occurs at the eaves.
just to be safe, i would check using 16-8b for the whole roof and compare it with the above approach to see which produces the greatest horizontal and vertical loads and go with the highest load.
it gets even more complicated if you have a back wall.
just be glad you didn't have to design this with asce 7-02.
figure 16-8b didn't exist.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wind load for a gable roof on an open structure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:44 PM
wind load calculation for belt conveyor truss design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:41 PM
open structure wind force on diagonal direction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 10:37 AM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:23 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多