几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 07:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rule of thumb wind loading

rule of thumb wind loading
i need some rule-of-thumb per-square-metre wind-loads. i have been using 1kn/m2 for some time but i have never checked its "accuracy". may anyone help me please?

in the us - 15 to 20 psf depending on locations, exposure group, height, etc seems about right
i'm also in the us:
i use 20 psf for main force resisting systems and 25 to 35 psf for components and cladding, depending on the componets location in the building.
on an east or north-east shore of a great lake .6kpa is about max. specified by the cdn nat. bldg. code for any location, so 1 kpa for rule of thumb is pretty conservative for a factored load in any inland location.
this should be dictated by your code and not depend on any rule of thumb. wind loading varies tremendously with location, especially in areas subject to hurricanes (tropical cyclones). other factors are height above ground, topography, shielding from other structures, structure shape, the list goes on. as others have indicated, the loading you should use varies also depending on whether you are considering the whole structure or a component thereof. in australia, wind loading on a given surface can vary from 0.5 kpa (10 psf) to 3.0 kpa (60 psf) or higher.
im in the uk. i use 1.1kn/m2 for small single elements in domestic construction and find it the be conservative. for anything more significant i would carry out a wind calc.
many thanks for the advice. it seems that my rule-of-thumb is conservative. i have checked my designs using analysis software (and none have ever given a load exceeding 1kn/m2) but, as one of your replies stated, wind is complex and i tend not to trust complicated design procedures such as wind codes which assume topography features, etc. every site is different and i doubt any site could be modelled accurately. if the rule-of-thumb gives a safe-load, then i am happier using that.
cheers.
a value of 1kn/m2 is a good value to use as a rule of thumb for concept design.

hemis: rules of thumb are a good one for if you wanted to increase your wind loads, but this is no substitute for mastering the clauses of you code and calculating the code prescribed load in each case.
regards,
ys
b.eng (carleton)
working in new zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...
my rule of thumb:
wind pressure p in psf, wind speed v in mph
p = (v/20)^2
canadian codes call for a gust factor of 2.0. so, 0.6 kpa x2= more than your "conservative" factor.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
question on wind load provisions of ibc 2000 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:57 PM
pressure loading due to wind huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 02:36 PM
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM
balcony guardrail wind huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:11 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:37 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多