几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 02:50 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 prism testing

prism testing
hey all,
i am in a small town that tends to be backwords at times, and most of the structural engineering has been done by civils who have tried hard, but sometimes don't understand the building code as well as they should to practice structural engineering, but that is a different subject for a different post. my question is about prism testing. the city reveiwers have told my client that no one requires prism testing (or other method as listed in the ubc) except our firm. as i understand it (we are using the 1997 ubc in this city), if you design masonry to the full capacity (ie. do not divide the allowables by 2) then special structural inspection is required as well as prism testing. the city seems to think that since no one else requires prisms when special inspection is required there must be a loophole in the code somewhere. i contacted the local testing agency engineer, and he says that he doesn't know, he just does what is required by the eor. the city says that i get to specify what tests are done as part of the special inspection, but it seems to me that prism testing or other method is required. does anyone else know any loophole, or anywhere that it says that the eor specifies exactly what tests are done as part of the inspection.
akastud
prism testing is only one of three ways to verify quality in masonry construction.
the section 1701.5.7. - structural masonry - covers the requirements for special inspection of masonry. it references the taking of prisms, but doesn't require prisms...it only says that the inspector needs to be there to observe the taking of prisms if they are made at all.
ubc 97, section 2107.1.2 says that you simply divide by two if you don't do special inspections.
now read section 2105.3. this sets compliance with f'm.
there are three ways to do this.
1. prism tests
2. prism test record
3. unit strength method
each of these three have separate provisions for full stress and half stress designs. normally, most engineers use unit stresses unless a higher than normal f'm is required. this doesn't require prisms, just testing of units and grout.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
load testing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:14 AM
load testing wood structure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:14 AM
field testing for epoxy anchors huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:42 AM
concrete testing labs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:46 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多