几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:16 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 max. rebar spacing

max. rebar spacing
according to aci 318, maximum spacing for rebars is 18" whether it's for flexure or shrinkage. however, i have seen in many places, including the residential bldg code, that wider spacings are specified. any reason why?

aci released aci 332-04 requirements for residential concrete which calls for 3 #4 for walls to 8' and 4 #4 for taller. obviously if plain concrete is acceptable, larger spacing should be, too. commercial will still have to hold to aci 318. the aci ad i got for the book recognized the loads and useage for residential were not as critical.
the reason why maximum spacings are specified is to prevent excessive shrinkage/flexural cracking.
the concrete at the reinforcing bars is restrained from cracking, but the reinforcing between the bars is not restrained and can therefore crack between the bars. the larger the spacing, the bigger this crack can become.
a small amount of reinforcement at large centres can sometimes be worse than no reinforcement due to this differential in shrinkage.
also worth noting is that the closer the spacing of the bars the better the shrinkage crack prevention as the less likely it is that cracks will form between the bars. welded wire reinforcing mesh is better for crack prevention than large bars.
18" seems high to me, i would normally use a maximum of 12" in walls and use smaller reinforcement if appropriate.
csd72, i agree. say you have a 10" antilever rw and your design calls for #5's at 16" oc. you place the rebars on the embankment side. what about the exposed face of the rw. i am also putting 2-#5's horizontally at the top of wall. i was thinking of placing #5's vertically at 32" or 48" on the front to hold the top horizontal rebars while pouring the concrete. do you think this will do more harm than good? would more horizontal rebars on the embankment side be necessary?
also, i was told that it is a good practice to put some rebars in the front face of the wall for shrinkage. any thoughts or suggestions.
thanks,
is the reinforcement for shrinkage only, or is it an area prone to frost? i am not experienced at frost, so my comments are on standard shrinkage.
for shrinkage only i cannot see how this can cause any cracking in the short and completely unrestrained vertical direction. also think of the fact that the front face will be under compresion.
in the horizontal, i would try and get cracking reinforcement at 16 to 18"cts if possible. you will need the vertical reinforcement to hold this in place. assuming the wall is at least 8" thick, i would put this both faces, if it is thinner, you can only fit one horizontal layer and i would put this on the external side of the vertical reinforcement.
i had a wall with 16mm (#5)bars at 12" cts and it still cracked due to soil restraint, so make sure you put in some control joints at reasonable centres.
csd72, were the cracks you mentioned vertical? my retaining wall is about 50' long and i am putting a construction joint at 25'. i could also place a 1/4" groove at 12.5' spacing for crack control.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
flame cutting rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:15 PM
epoxy coated rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:38 PM
correct column tie spacing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:04 PM
请帮忙解决以下这个程序不能运行的问题,谢谢 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 04:28 PM
请帮忙解决以下这个程序不能运行的问题,谢谢 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-27 12:34 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:59 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多