几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:00 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 which is stronger

which is stronger?
when building a structure from tubular material, would the use of bends in continuous piece be stronger and more rigid than the same angle being made out of two straight pieces welded together? assuming a good mandrel bend(outside radius stretched, inside radius commpressed)opposed to a large radius weld. the material is 4130 .083 thick.-thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
generally it is felt better to bend the metal than to weld it although there is no difference in strength. firstly it is cheaper as you take most of the labour out of the process, secondly, welding the material may cause problems in producing permanent deformation in the beam due to the weld stresses, and thirdly, a weld is more likely to fail due to fatigue for the same stresses than plain material, if varying loads are to be encountered. the problem with bending the material is that it may crack, however, and you would have to choose the material carefully.
umm
bending: cold working adds strength
welding: welds often are not perfect
the thichness limits bend radius
bending can also distort the cross-section...
that is why there are limit on the bend radius.
jstein..considering the thickness you are dealing with and the difficulty in achieving consistent weld quality on thin materials, i would opt for bending. if this is a fracture critical or fatigue sensitive application, even more reason to go with bending.
thanks! as you probably know this a race car roll cage.there is no post heat treating after the welding is done. knowing this ,would the structure be stronger with the pieces welded one on top of another(like limbs to a tree trunk) or welded slightly apart from each other(so that the welds don't overlap)thanks again!
thin wall tubing normally does not require stress relief. for parts thicker than .120", stress-relieving is recommended and 1,100&ordm;f is the optimum temperature for tubing applications. weld rod er80s-d2, should be used. this filler material is capable of producing welds that approximate the strength of 4130. thin wall tubing (< 0.120" wall) applications do not typically require the normal 300&ordm;f to 400&ordm;f pre-heat to obtain acceptable results. however, tubing should be at room temperature (70&ordm;f) or above before welding.
the two options should be considered for a design and fabrication veiw point since the there is little difference in the weld strenght.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:33 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多