几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 05:13 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 uniform force method question

uniform force method question
i am reviewing calcualtions for a braced frame connection. the contractor took the liberty of fabricating and erecting the steel, before we even recieved design calcs or shops drawings. the connection is what is typically shown in aisc heavy diagonal brace connections where a beam, column, and diagonal brace meet at a single work point. the connection is very similar to what is shown in aisc 2nd ed. lrfd vol 2, fig. 11-7. the gusset is bolted to the column and welded to the beam. the beam is bolted to the column.
my issue with the calculations are that the gusset to beam connection is detailed in such a way that alpha and alpha-bar are not equal (ideal centroid for no moment on connection and actual centriod with respect to column flange). this in turn induces a moment on the gusset to beam interface (which is indicated on the calcs i am reviewing). my thinking in looking at the free body of the beam is that this also induces an end moment in the beam as well that we did not design for. the connection designer is stating that the method takes into account this eccentricty and is not affecting the beam. the only thing that i can think of is, that perhaps he is assuming that this moment at the beam/gusset interface is resisted by a couple created at the beam/column connection and gusset/column connection, but it seems to me that the load path still needs to go through the beam first. and the horizontal forces on the beam/column and gusset/column connection do not seem to indicate this.
i would appreciate any comments that anyone may have regarding that if there is a moment induced at the beam/gusset interace, then this needs to be resisted by a moment in the beam. thanks in advance.
check out our whitepaper library.
shepard,
sometimes i've determined the optimum alpha location and then consider an effective lengh of weld which maintains a coincident alpha-bar.
if that effective weld is sufficient, then the loading condition is satisfied.
if that doesn't work, you may be able to design it similar to special case 2 and design extra moment at the gusset beam interface.
good luck
jpj
jpj,
thanks for the response. the connection has been fabricated and the calculations do indicate there is a moment at the gusset beam interface (alpha not equal to alpha bar). the weld and connection has been designed for this moment;however, the beam (designed as part of a vertical truss) was never designed for any additional end moment. am i missing something, does the moment not get transfered to the beam as well? as you point to special case 2, would you not have to design the beam for the moment (mub)shown in the beam free body?
thanks
shepherd
the gusset must be designed for the moments, as does the welds and the beam. you have to verify that the beam can carry the additional moment induced and also handle the concentrated loads. on page 11-45 under solution b (special case 1) at the bottom of the page states the following where a moment (mub) of 145 kip-ft is applied to the beam. "the moment, as well as the beam axial load hu = 149 kips and the moment and shear in the beam associated with the end reaction rub must be considered in the design of the beam." seems pretty cut and dry to me. i almost always have some sort of gusset interface moment force, and i always check that the
thanks aggman for pointing me to that example. the calculated moments induced by the designers assumed geoemtry are quite large, and we intended the design to not induce additional loads on the
after a little more study, i've found the shortcoming in my thinking. this moment at the beam/gusset interface is in fact counteracted by the eccentricity of the horizontal beam force at the interface and the eccentricty due to alpha not equal to alpha bar. the beam experiences no net moment; however, it must be checked for local affects from the moment at the beam/gusset interface on the beam web. thanks to aggman and virtualengineer for their responses.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
uniform force method design of gussets huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 05:13 PM
projected area method vs normal force method huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:00 PM
flange brace force huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:15 PM
c.k.wang intermediate structural analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:58 PM
brace connection using uniform force method huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:35 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:14 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多