几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:38 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 stress for tubing

stress for tubing
for mild thin wall steel tube 1 inch by 1 inch by .062 what would be the allowable stress 65,000 or 22,000 psi? tensile, compression and bending? thanks don


find a job or post a job opening
don54660...it would seem that your question would be a simple one; however, it is not!
for most static structural applications such as buildings and components, the allowable stresses for materials have been well established for many years. in most instances, the allowable stresses for steel will be in the range of 60 to 66 percent of the yield strength for tension and bending induced tensile stress, and about 40 percent of the yield strength for shear stresses.
these values accommodate the variabilities of materials, minor load variability, load sharing/distribution not considered in typical analytical techniques, etc.
for applications other than buildings, the values can vary a great deal, depending on application, margin of safety, load reversals, fatigue, etc.
thank you for responding, i am aware of a safety factor. my concern is in one reference book it list 22,000 for tube (mild steel) and another for tensile and compression 65,000 psi for mild steel??? or am i missing something. this is for general construction and they do list a safety factor for certain conditions. my question is why a spec for tube and another for steel beams and sheets.
the low stress may be to prevent buckling. what are your loading conditions? what are the references you are using?
hello lcubed, actually two seperate references (books)
the first is:
1.machinery's handbook h.rourge chapter title section is 'strength of materials'.
it was given in a chart called stresses at yield point of different materials. examples

a. machine steel...tensile 47,000 shearing 30,000 lb per sq in
b.high carbon steel... tensile 60,000 shearing 27,000
c.steel tubing...22,000 tensile and shearing 13.000.
the caption above this table says this,"the accompanying table gives values for the unit tensile and unit shearing stresses at the yield point of a number of different matertials. by using a suitable factor of safety , the permissable working stresses ,may be obtained from this table", meaning the information given above and also meaning add in a safety factor for the figures shown.
the next was given in a book on building 'space frames' for sports car chassis (a british book). it listed the following for tubes.
a.20 ton tensile for welded seam mild steel tubing bs 980 erw1.(electrical seam welded tubing)
b.25 ton tensile for welded seam mild steel tubing bs 980 erw2
c.cold drawn bs 980 cds1 20 ton tensile
d.cold drawn bs cds2 28 ton tensile
c.other cold drawn.
ti 35 ton
t45 45 ton
t50 50 ton.
this last book is talking about square and round tubing only, that is, no shapes or sheet material,however the specs are close to the one given in the machinery's handbook for tube .
hope this help clarify what i am looking for, which is, what stress should i use for tubing? i can figure in a safety factor for different condition, those are given in the machinery's handbook. don
i couldn't find the table in my 24th edition of mh, but tubing made of a material should exhibit the same mechanical properties as any other form of the same material. if the tubing is welded, there may be a reduction in strength due to the welding, and that might account for the low published strength. other than that, the same steel should have the same strength.
since buckling is a common failure mode for tubing, my first thought in my earlier post was that buckling might be taken into account in your references, but i don't think that is the case.
given only the information cited, i would lean toward the conservative approach, and use the low value. sorry i can't be of more help.
thanks all, i am not making anything, i am trying to understand some things about tube stress and design. here is a sketch i made of a space frame that uses the tube i have questioned.
don54660...
your reference showing the steel tube at 22,000 psi for tensile and 13,000 psi for shear is typical of a mild steel, similar to a36 or other mild steels (sae 1040 etc.). most steel tubes are going to be in the mild steel range, whether round, rectangular, or square, though there are some high strength tubes available.
for bending, the 22,000 psi allowable tensile (extreme fiber stress) is probably close.
thank you,
is the following correct?
a chinning bar (tube) is supported at each end at a distance of 72 inches (resting on its edges) and an 85 pounds load is placed exactly at the center of this bar. the chinning bar is actually a tube supporting this load and is 1x1x.062wall, a hollow square tube(properties 22,000).
i want the stress and deflection for the tube. also i want to know if this load is acceptable for the 22000 (is this yield strength) spec from earlier posts.
so...
85x72/4=1530
1530x.5/moment of inertia for the 1 inch tube (.03448)
1530x.5/.03448=22186psi
question:is that too high for the tube for a static load.
the deflection for the tube would be .63 with the conditions indicated, that is, 72 inches and an 85 pound load.
therefore.
85x72cubed/48 (30,000)(.03448)=.63 deflection
is this right? is it yield or ultimate stress?
don,
e is 30,000,000, but that appears to be just a typo. deflection and stress calculations look correct. stress is simply stress, not yield or ultimate. having calculated the stress, you need to compare the stress to the limit which you do not wish to exceed. in this case, you presumably do not want any permanent deformation after the application and removal of the load, so yield strength of 22 ksi is the upper limit of allowable stress, and it is being slightly exceeded.
also, the load on a chinning bar is not static. in theory, a "suddenly applied" load causes twice the deflection of a gradually applied static load. the load on a chinning bar is probably subject to a much larger multiplier. i don't know what standards are used by the sporting goods industry, but i think you should apply a factor of at least 5.0 to the load to get the equivalent static load of 425 pounds.
hope this helps.
don,
i ran across your thread on this subject in another forum, and by the time i had composed a response to a comment by adk, i had lost track of the location of that thread. here is what i wanted to say, but it was prompted by adk in the other forum, so it doesn't connect with anything in this thread.
moment over section modulus = m/(i/c) = mc/i, so adk is just restating the equation, which can be useful sometimes, particularly in selecting structural sections. your stress calculations are correct.
as long as instability doesn't enter the picture, allowable bending stress can safely exceed pure tensile strength, because the maximum stress is not imposed on the entire cross section. for your purposes, however, just take the yield strength as the maximum allowable tensile stress.
plastic buckling (crippling) due to excessive compression on the upper part of the tube is the most likely failure mode if you were to overload this tubular beam to failure. it is not likely to occur under the conditions you have described, but be sure not to exceed the compressive yield strength of your material, as it is just as important as the tensile strength.
hope this helps.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
strain driven versus stress driven huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:22 AM
residual stress in bent steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:22 PM
maximum beam stress calculation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:18 PM
calculating reinforcing actual stress huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:03 PM
allowable fatigue stress huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:57 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:24 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多