几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 shear reinforcement for grade beams of slab on grade

shear reinforcement for grade beams of slab on grade
hi, all,
i have designed a slab on grade for a new residential house. i have design the grade beam to be 15" wide x 22" deep w/ 2-#4 @ top & bott & w/ #3 ties @ 32" o.c. in addition, the slab is designed to be 4" thick w/ #4@ 18" o.c. e.w. the contractor came to me indicating that he has been in the construction for almost 20 years and never used shear reinforcement for the grade beams of slab on grade. it confused me. as i always think that putting shear rebars at the grade beam usually is a good practise. i think the shear reinforcement can make the grade beam stronger to resist the unknow shear that might happed to the beam such as temperature, settlement, heave, expansive soil, bad foundation base reparation. i wonder, except to save a little bit construction cost, if there are any other good reasons not using the adequate shear reinforcement.
the second question he imposed on me is that he would like to use wwf to replace #4 rebars @18" o.c. for slab. i knew that using wwf is quite all right. but, what was wrong not using #4? except to save cost.
any comments are appreciated.
find a job or post a job opening
shear values are way less than half allowable, so stirrups not needed. you can't design for unknown loads, else why stop with #4 reinforcing? typical here is #4 on slab as they have them anyways.
i specify shear reinforcement just to help tie the longitudinal reinforcement together (i.e. convenience of installation).
history has shown that residential foundation loads are so low that the cost savings from minimizing steel reinforcing are almost always justified. unless you have special considerations, your contractor's advice sounds reasonable.
here is a link to a typical residential foundation reference (free .pdf dowload)
here is a better reference. "residential structural design guide - 2000 edition". you can download the free document from this page
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
shear in slab desig need to be considered or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 09:41 PM
pt slab design - something called drop bands or slab bands huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:17 PM
post-tensioned beams parallel to slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 01:51 PM
grade beam detail question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:57 PM
flat slab reinforcement details huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:24 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:49 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多