几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:39 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic connection between buildings

seismic connection between buildings
i am working on an expansion to a steel framed freezer building. the freezer building is a rectangular box, approxmately 40' tall, in seismic design category d. because of thermal issues, i am investigating tying the buildings together (instead of providing a seismic separation per code). since the column lines will match, my current thinking is to bolt or weld the new and existing columns together at the roof. the existing freezer has concentrically braced frames on all sides, and the new expansion will also have concentrically braced frames on all sides. so the buildings have roughly the same rigidities. so, for the combined building, i will have two separate diaphragms connected at intervals. does this sound reasonable? does anybody know where i can find some information about about how to determine the design forces in the connectors between diaphragms? my first thought was to consider them as "collectors" to be designed seismic overstrength. but working through some quick numbers, i think that this large force will overwhelm the joist and beam connections to columns on the existing side of the expansion.
check out our whitepaper library.
since you will be having a new structural behaviour, it is from the combined model that you can extract the proper forces.
you might start thinking of the joined parts as if being one, say from two columns one, and then see that in more than the correct overall behaviour the connectors meet the requirements of union.
for joists of different pattern this may not work but one always can get forces for the discrete link connectors to be put in place, once put in the model. this also would work for the columns, always exercising engineering judgement.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
omf seismic connection - wf to hss huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 10:30 AM
ocbf brace connection - aisc 97 seismic provisions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:52 PM
ibc 2000 - seismic-force-resisting system huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:38 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
bridge crane seismic loads on buildings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:07 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:28 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多