几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 07:22 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 roof drain restrictors

roof drain restrictors
i'll try to keep this short.
i am designing a building where there are some drainage problems. to save money the civil engineer/contractor would like to reduce the amount of drainage discharged into the street drainage system by installing some "flow restrictors" on the main drains for the roof. it appears that the flow restrictors are a 6" high pvc with holes drilled in the side to restrict the amount of water flowing into the drainage system. on the top of the pvc pipe is a grate that would allow the water to freely flow into the drainage system (if the water ever got to be that high). please see attached.
due to the location, the building has already been designed for a roof snow load of 35psf (code requirements).
question, should the roof design load be increased to reflect the potential of 6" of standing water on the roof together with the snow load? or is it unrealistic to say that you would have the full 6" of water together with the full snow load?

i would be worried about icing and blockage of the drain. how is this scenario to be handled?
i am not a big fan of rooftop detention, but if it must be - another thought. i would be nice, that if the works got plugged, the top of the proposed drain would be large enough, with enough air, to lift the restrictor out of the pipe, allowing the water to escape - unless the architect is providing overflow scuppers at the outside walls.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
they had mentioned over flow scuppers at the edge of the roof in case the drain was plugged. however, due to roof pitch, i believe they would have to install an auxiliary drainage system.
this whole thing seems weird to intentionally retain water on a roof.

if you are going to retain water on the roof then you need to go thru a ponding analysis.
if the roof pitch is significant then you will need separate interior overflow drains as you stated. we always ran those thru the outside building wall so hopefully someone will notice the "plugged condition".
we used to use undersized drains years ago with flat roofs but got away from them because the ponded water would cause the roof to wear out prematurely.
asce 7 calls for roof live load, snow load or rain load.
rain on snow surcharge is addressed under snow loads but will not apply in your situation, pg<20 psf.
controlled drainage systems are addressed under rain loads in asce 7.
most of this information is copied in ibc without much change.
the first design will easily plug with leaves. the second design may actually be less likely to plug up. however i believe intentionally ponding water on the roof is foolhardy.
a beehive grate would be my recommendation.
don't forget that it's 6" of standing water (static head) plus the hydraulic head of the water over the drain inlet.
ucfse:
from the sketch, i think the dead storage is only a couple of inches locally at the inlet, with the max live storage of around 4" for a head to the orifice of 3 to 4", plus, as you mentioned, any hydraulic charging or backwater effect to attain the orifice design flow.
also like like this could be a multiple orifice condition.
if this is an interior drain, don't forget to install multiple cleanouts at the bends to mitigate future headaches.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
from my experience, these small grates clog very easily with leaves, pine needles, rocks and other debris. this can reduce the flow down to a fraction of the unclogged capacity and can even block the drain entirely. the head you will need to drain the water from the roof is dependant on the capacity of the "partially-blocked" drains and secondarily on the level of any overflow scuppers that may be provided. this could easily exceed your 6 inches. a significant safety factor should be used to account for at least 50% blockage of the grates.
structuraly you will have to design for the ponding water up to the auxilliary drains plus a little for flow.
realistically, you are going to clog everytime it rains and have no problem locating all of the leaks in the roof.
why not use a standard roof drain?
i built a lab addition that had rain retention in the parking lot. the chgo metropolitan sanitary district obliged us to do this.
this leads to the idea of remote retention off the roof; free flow off the roof into a retention structure like a tank rupture retention structure. let that flow down thru a restrictor. favor the roof against collapse.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
perpendicular roof wind pressures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:13 PM
low slope roof construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:50 AM
gypsum roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:37 PM
flat roof repairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:23 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:19 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多