几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 12:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 perforated shearwalls per ibc section 2305.3.7.2

perforated shearwalls per ibc section 2305.3.7.2
can someone please help clear up some of the grey areas i have about this section???
1. "the maximum opening height shall be taken as the maximum opening clear height.
say i have a 5' window that is 3' off the sill plate. i first took this to mean that the opening height is from the top of the window down to the sill plate (totaling 8'). however, i then begin to wonder when i would ever have a maximum opening height that would fall under the h/3 category. i think having the h/3 category and showing sample opening heights of 2'-8" and 3'-4" tends to suggest that the opening clear height is actually just the height dimension of the opening (5'). this does make some sense too since as long as you have sheathing with the appropriate nailing pattern in the areas above and below the window, they will add stiffness and should be accounted for. am i right in my thoughts?
2. uplift anchorage at perforated shearwall ends
the equation for calculating the uplift doesn't incorporate the vertical resistance to uplift that you will get from applied dead loads. my solution to this is to calculate vh, subtract 2/3 of the dead load multiplied by 1/2 the total perforated shearwall length (its moment arm), and then divide that value by the adjustment factor multiplied by its sum of perforated shearwall segment widths. any reason why i shouldn't incorporate my dead loads?
3. anchorage for in-plane shear
issue 1
the equation divides the shear force (v) by the adjustment factor applied to the sum of perforated shear wall segment widths. first of all, isn't this very conservative as the sections of sheathing under and above the window will help stiffen the shearwall? i think that starting with just a portion of the wall, not even the whole wall, and then reducing that even more with an adjustment factor is simply way too conservative. i imagine that you should be able to use the whole length multiplied by the adjustment factor.
issue 2
ok, assume the method is correct for issue 1... now, when it comes down to the sill plate and its fasteners, i would think that you should be able to use the full length of the wall instead of just its segments. my reasoning here is that, unless the opening is a doorway, the sill plate would be continuous and would spread the load through the entire length. therefore, i think that for sill plate fasteners i should be able to take v and divide it by the adjustment factor applied to the entire length of the perforated wall. what are your thoughts on this?
i know this is quite a bit and i hope i haven't thrown too much confusion into my cry for knowledge. if you have questions or think i may be heading off on the wrong track, please let me know... i've thought about this way too much today and my brain is a little fried.
tdawgui


the maximum opening height applies when you have more than one opening--you must use the largest opening height when entering the table.
you can use 0.6*dl to resist overturning. i don't have the code in front of me, but i recall you still must design the uplift for the wall shear times the height of the wall.
i talked to ed keith of the apa about this once--he said in seismic zones when a perforated shear wall is "rocking and rolling" the sill plates under full height segments of the wall see more shear. his comment applies to shear walls above the first floor of a building. it does not apply to shear walls attached to a foundation wall, but the code does not differentiate.
daveatkins
dave,
i understand that the maximum designates the largest opening, but what dimension is used as the clear height? is it the dimension from the top of the window to the bottom of the window or is it the dimension from the top of the window to the sill plate?
using 0.6*dl makes sense to me. for some reason i thought it was 2/3, but i can't find that anywhere so i'll use 0.6.
any comment on #3-issue 1?

the 0.6 dl factor is to be used, check your ibc load combinations for opposing wind/dead load effects. clear dimension is top of window/door to bottom of window/door. if you have no doors in your wall, it is just the height of the window itself.
i commented on # 3 in my first response. you must follow the code. if you have further questions, i would call apa--they have been very helpful to me in the past.
daveatkins
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
confused with aisc code about section modulus huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:07 PM
built up section - sction modulus huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:46 PM
section of a section huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:48 PM
【转帖】section of a section yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:53 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:33 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多