几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:26 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 parking garage - live loads and live load reductions

parking garage - live loads and live load reductions
just wanted to pass along a good concise article describing what has become quite a mess in the codes the past few years - parking garage live loads and live load reductions:
in cast insitu parking garages, and for that matter, any building where live load reduction has been used in the design of the horizontal members, has anyone ever checked the back propping requirements of the floors?
though the floor is theoretically designed to carry 50psf, some
thanks
i am a new
i've been involved in the design of several dozen parking structures and live load reduction shouldn't be an issue. with typical cip concrete parking structures, a series of long beams at 15'+/- on centre pick up a concrete slab. the ll red factor for the slab is 1, the ll red factor for the individual beams is calculated on the trib area of the beam and the supporting columns are designed based on the total trib area the column supports... pretty straight forward.
for alternating loads, for slab design and column moment determination, have considered using the 'real' live load for a parking structure. a fully loaded parking structure if vehicles were parked side by side and in all the isles, etc. would be loaded to less than 20 psf and more likely 15 psf max. this adds assurance about any live load reduction you undertake...
dik
brantlet
are these structures that are failing and being repaired prestressed flat plates or other structural systems?
if they are flat plates, a lot of the blame, in my humble opinion, can be attributed to the structural layout used in unbonded pt slabs and the design methodology being used by designers using aci and pti design methods for unbonded pt flat plates rather than the use of live load reduction by itself. obviously designing for a significantly reduced live load makes the problem worse.
regarding the point load, no it should not be reduced and the width of it's influence should be considered carefully.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
nbc 2005 parking garage live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:43 PM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
live load reduction factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:52 AM
live load reduction two way slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:51 AM
100 or 100 = 25 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:27 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:55 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多