几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:23 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 maximum slenderness ratio

maximum slenderness ratio
hi,
does anybody use, as a rule of thumb, a maximum slenderness ratio for concrete columns even though structurally a slender column can work?
thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
start with kl/r<22 (that is assuming k=1.0 and m1=m2 with single curvature)
since i don't have time, budget or software to do a full-fledged analysis, i keep the slenderness below 100 to avoid this (aci requirement).
if the slenderness ratio is above 100, you have to do a more detailed analysis of the secondary effect.
as a preliminary design, you should use the minimum allowed area of steel to determine the area of column. this way, at the end of the design if you find the column needs more capacity then you can only increase the area of steel to achieve this.
it seemed to me he was asking about avoiding slenderness checks. the op does say that even though a slender column can work, what slenderness ratio do you shoot for. i interpretted that to mean to avoid the slenderness checks altogether.
was that your intention?
unless you have very tall architectural columns carrying little load, kl/r will almost never approach 100. i had a job recently in which it exceeded 100 and a detailed second order analysis was required, but these were architecural columns that were very small in cross-section due to having very little load (and the look the architect was going for).
if these columns had any significant load on them, the section would have needed to be bigger and the slenderness ratio would have come way down.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
maximum slenderness for aluminum columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:23 PM
maximum metal roof deck diaphragm aspect ratio huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:21 PM
limiting slenderness ratio huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:38 AM
in-place wood column - improve slenderness huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:20 PM
aisc slenderness check vs aisc combined axial and bending ch huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:43 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:30 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多