几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 04:15 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 help solving an easy stress and displacement problem

help solving an easy stress and displacement problem
hi,
i'm an entry level engineer fresh out of college. i'm still having problems learning how to apply the basics to real world problems because they did not do a good job teaching us that in school.
i was hoping someone could tell me how i go about solving the problem below by using hand calculations. i need to find the max stress and max displacement and am not sure how to go about solving this. i don't need the exact solution but i provided a picture in hopes someone could teach me how to set it up and solve it myself.
i realize this is probably a really easy problem but i do appreciate any help i can get. thanks.
it's impossible to tell what you are asking from the picture. describe the structure and the loading in words, and make some sketches of plan, elevation and section as appropriate. that will be the first step in preparing your hand calculation, and it will help us understand your problem.
this is a small sheet metal support made out of al 6061-0 that is 0.045 inches thick throughout. there is a load that is evenly distributed on the top surface totaling 50 pounds. the bottom of the two supports are resting on a firm surface. the part is 1 inch high...from the bottom surface of the leg to the top surface holding the load.
thank you for your help and i'm sorry that i wasn't very clear in the first post. if this still isn't enough info i'm very sorry, but please let me know and i can tell you whatever i'm missing.
thanks for your help!
this can be treated as a frame analysis with the ends pinned. the midspan moment can be approximated by wl^2/8 to wl^2/12 (8 would be conservative, 12 not). the corner moments would be somewhere in the range of wl^2/18 for the pinned condition, going to 0 at the support. you then need to check buckling of the turn-down. 0.045 aluminum is fairly stiff, but your temper is t0, so your allowable stresses are relatively low, as compared to a t6 condition.

i'm getting 37 ksi with a 1/2" deflection or so.
step 1 - free body diagram. i simplified it as a simple beam spanning 6" with an 8.333 lb/in dist load
step 2 - shear diagram = 25-8.33x; moment diagram = 25x-4.167x^2; rotation diagram = ct+12.5x^2-1.388x^3; deflection diagram = ct x + 4.17x^3-0.3472x^4
step 3 - calculate max stress due to max moment = mxx y/ixx
step 4 - calculate max deflection (x=3)
step 5 - check assumptions - bc of step 1 simplification, the rotation at each end amplifys the deflection at the center so add a little on to the max deflection calculated (ie cut with axe).

teguci.......i tried it your method and got the same answers you did. i have also ran this through pro/e mechanica to compare the answers. i know i won't get the exact answers but i was wondering, generally, how much error is acceptable. in this case mechanica found a 0.155" deflection and a 28 ksi von mises stress.
i would model it with a roller at one end
did i miss something? what the heck are the support conditions? pin...pin, pin...roller or what? in any event, whatever they are, the problem is easily solved by hand methods.
ba
in a normal beam, the assumption is made that the flanges are able to freely expand in width and thickness. with a wide flat bar, the tension flange and compression flange are attached together, and no longer free to expand/contract laterally. if i re
something else to consider is that if it's a 1-off item, it may be cheaper to add $2 worth of steel that you don't need than to do $50 worth of extra analysis on it.
pin-pin means that a horizontal reaction can be generated, enabling a horizontal coupling force to be generated as the vertical deflection increases that will counter the vertical deflection. the greater the deflection seen, the higher the coupling force and resiulting moment generated.
such is not the case with a pinned - roller model where no horizontal force can be generated. the model should be pinn - roller as tegici suggested.
i am assuming the shape is just sitting on a flat surface here with no special attachment to the next shape. however, if the legs are attached together with horizontal tek screws, this becomes a different problem with more of a fixed condition in the short legs. not true fixity, but partial.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
deflection of beam in x and y huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:56 PM
deflection and tensile stress in pipe huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:49 PM
allowable compression stress for a rectangular plate column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:54 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:11 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多