几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 11:59 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 concrete cracks

concrete cracks
during the construction of a multistory concrete building (bays 25 x 28 ft) we noticed many long concrete cracks at the botom of the slabs. some of the cracks are large enough for water to pass through from one floor to the other. the cracks are always located at either the midspand or at 1/3 points. in addition to the cracks the slabs appear to have deflected. the concrete slab thickness is 9". the shoring plan calls for (3) three floors at 7, 14 & 21 days to support (1) one freshly poured floor. however, at this point i am not sure this is what really takes place. i can only think of two posibilities here:
(1)the slabs have been overloaded during construction.
(2)the slabs may have been underdesigned.
any comments or recommendations will be appreciated?

find a job or post a job opening
before we jump to any conclusions, is the structure post-tensioned?
with the thickness and spans indicated, is the slab constructed with drop panels? i've encountered the problem with the slab rotating at the bottom of the drop panel and creating tension throughout the entire slab between drop panels at the middle of the slab. in one instance, the slab had opened enough to allow a business card to be passed through.
this sounds unusual to me. what other info can you provide? rebar size? known construction loads placed on the slabs? anything unusual about the concrete mix? are the cracks visible gaps? does the water flow straight through the cracks and drip on the other side? or does it form a damp patch on the underside?
is it one story or multi? was there re-shoring involved? are the slabs of one way or two way design? what is the reinforcing? what is the design superimposed dl and design ll?
no there are no drop panels.
f'c(slab)=6000 psi in areas with f'c(columns = 7000 psi
upper levels f'c(slab)= 5000
largest bay = 26.33' span
rebar: #5 at 12" o.c.
rebar: #4 perp to the span.
camber: +1/2"
ll = 40 psf. this is the load teh shoring plan is based on.
many thanks to everyone
this could be a bit light on the reinforcement steel. min required ratio to gross area oftemperature and shrinkage reinforcement based on aci-318-99 is .0018 for grade 60 rebar. you have
.31 sq in / 108 sq in = 0.00287. not much more than needed just to support temperature and shrinkage.
what type of shoring system is being used?
is it a post tensioned slab?
at what point is the slab stripped of the supporting formwork?
daniel
if this is a one-way slab system (spanning 25 to 28 feet), with a 9" slab -
if you use dl = slab wt. plus 10 psf
with ll = 40 psf
i get a required area of flexural steel at about 0.44 sq. in per foot. (assuming a wl^2/11 moment for a rough calc.)
this is #6 @ 12"o.c., not #5's.
so much for the factored design....
for the servicability -
dead load only moment comes to about 6.9 ft-kips which creates a tension stress on the bottom of 512 psi. fr = 7.5sqrt(f'c) = 530 psi so you are very close to the cracking stress based on the 28 day strength...the formwork removal may be occurring at a lower concrete strength.
without the actual spans, support fixities, in-place dead loads, etc. i can't do much more than this but it may be that you could do further analysis and see what the actual stresses are on the slab at form removal/reshoring activities and get a handle on what's going on.
minimum 3 levels at 7-14-21+ are supporting 1 level above.
no it is not a post tensioned slab
unless you have edge beams or drop panels, you need ln/30 minimum slab thickness (aci table 9.5(c)) for exterior panels. for a 26.33 ft span, this comes out to 10.53 inches. note that the span is defined as face of column to face of column, so it might work out to a little less. for interior panels, the limit is ln/33 or 9.58 inches. if these aren't exceeded, they're very close.
i would be wary about using anything less than these limits. i also suspect the reinforcing is light.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete corrosion in partial saturated condition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
concrete compressive strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:53 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM
blinding concrete - specified grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:56 PM
28 day vs. 56 day concrete breaks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:24 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多