几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:35 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 chloride and sulphate resistance with superp

chloride and sulphate resistance with superp
type 50 (5) cement is used for sulphate resistance. it is my understanding that this is not recommended for exposure to both sulphate and chloride attack.
the material i've spec'd is what we refer to as hsb which is a blended sulphate resistant concrete; the cementitious material is often made up using type 10 (normal) with as much as 25% flyash. this can achieve both the sulphate and chloride resistance.
the contractor wants to provide type 50 and to minimise the cement content (cost) and achieve the max w/c ratio, he wants to prepare a mix with minimum slump and use superplasticiser to improve the flowability.
is anyone aware of a problem with using superplasticers that will reduce sulphate and chloride resistance (other than checking with the superp supplier)?
dik
check out our whitepaper library.
dik..i don't know of any issues with that. i can't think of any reason that superp would affect the sulphate and chloride resistance. it might actually help since you would expect better density in the concrete.
the contractor's approach to reduce the cement content and maximize the w-c ratio are not good for long term durability of the concrete.

thanks, ron should have made it clear... he wants to max the w/c to 0.4. my error... pretty much what i thought.
dik
depending on the cement and fly ash source, 25% fly ash with a type 10 (1) can achieve what's consider type 50(5) equivalent performance for up to class 2 sulphate exposure. see aci 201 for the full story on that. i agree with ron that the super will benefit by minimizing the w/c ratio and thus the permeability of the paste. keep the bad stuff out, it won't hurt the concrete. minimizing the paste volume is also a good idea by minimizing the cementitious materials, give the bad stuff less to work with. i'm not sure why he would so want to use the type 50 instead of his typical type 10 and fly ash.
you would be better off using a normal cement, high range sp such as glenium 3030 and pushing the w/c to below 0.35 and use internal curing to prevent self dessication shrinkage. this will give you a mixture that is highly resistant to anything because the paste is so dense.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:18 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多