几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:05 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 calculating torsion

calculating torsion...
real quick question (i hope)...
say you have a beam that that is simply supported by hss sections on each end.
how does one determine the torsion that the beam places on the hss sections??
sorry for this simple question...but i can't find any good examples of this in my books.
tia!
---
andrew
hi, dmwwengr,
quick answer coming up.. it all depends on what you mean by 'simply supported'.
if your beam is genuinely simply supported, with bearings at each end permitting free end rotations, then your answer is simply that the total torque applied to the hss will be the end reaction multiplied by any eccentricity between the bearing and the hss centreline. the total should be proportioned between the adjacent sections of hss according to their lengths. (eg if you have 2 feet one side, 4 feet the other, the torque in the shorter length is twice the longer).
if, as i suspect, you really mean that you have assumed the beam to be simply supported for analysis purposes, but it will be rigidly connected to the hss, that is another matter.
for that case, (short of running a simple 3d frame analysis, which could be quicker than digesting my response), you will get a slightly conservative value for your torques thus:
(a) calculate the end slopes of your simply supported beam.
(b) apply your calculated slopes to the hss elements as imposed rotations, and determine the resulting torques from the standard formulae. (eg timoshenko and goodier, theory of elasticity, chapter 11).
good luck.
if you let fall a beam on 2 parallel hss sections of same deformation, the conjoint rotation with such beams at both ends is the same, and, except you are counting the created eccentricity of the load (p·e) there's no torsion, that requires relative torsional distortion between sections.
however, as austim says, making an analysis taking unto account what the case requires is the general approach.
thanks,
yep austim, it is the second approach. guess it wasn't as simple as i hoped but it's still do-able
thanks for the responses.
---
andrew
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
bending or bending = torsion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:29 PM
bending and torsion on curved monorail huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:25 PM
beams with torsion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:13 PM
asce 7 wind torsion loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:00 PM
allowable torsion strees on steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:09 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:57 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多