几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 12:56 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 slot call ou

slot call out
what is the best way to call out a slot? i have used basic dimension to reference the true center of the slot from 2 perpendicular datums. then i called out the width of the slot and the height (the length from one tangent line off the full radius to the other tangent line) using standard dimension with tolerances. then i called out the "2 x full radius" and also had a positioning block calling out diametric position of the center of the freature. does this sound correct?
that is one of several correct methods.
i had to read it a few times, sounds ok.
just a side note ... "2 x" should be "2x". i see this a lot.
chris, sr. mechanical designer, cad
solidworks 05 sp3.1 / pdmworks 05
"2 x full radius" on a slot callot is straight from the department of redundancy department. just say "slot".
i never thought it would happen, but i must disagree with thetick. y14.5 requires that "r" be called out, to ensure that it wasn't simply a mistake on the detailers part in missing a dimension. you don't need the "full" in front of it, but it does no harm in having that also. it really depends on what standard the drawing is done to (asme y14.5, industry or company).
ewh,
i would say that the 2x r callout is correct, period, as noted in asme y14.5m-1994. i am not sure what it means when you add the word full.
all you are trying to say is that the ends of the slots are round, and their size controlled by the width of the slot.
jhg
drawoh,
i agree with you. i'm not sure where "full" originally came from, but i do re
i am not sure where it originated. i have been told by machinist's and inspectors that if you call out "2x r" on a slot, it can be technically any radius. if you call out "2x r full", it is a radius exactly the width of the slot (same tolerance).
chris, sr. mechanical designer, cad
solidworks 05 sp3.1 / pdmworks 05
according to y14.5, hydroformer's method is close to being correct. the standard omits the word "slot" from the callout, and states that the end radii are to be indicated but not dimensioned.
no arguing with the standards. seemed too obvious on the surface. star for ewhfff"> for actually looking this up.
proedj-
don't you have a copy of y14.5m-1004?
tunalover
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】ambiguous call to overload functions in odstring.h yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:56 PM
【转帖】using the virtual condition of slot as datum yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:07 AM
【转帖】slot call ou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 10:00 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:44 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多