几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 06:56 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wall stud deflection

wall stud deflection
here in florida our new code now contains language taken from the international code limiting stud deflections due to lateral (i.e. wind) loads . distinction is made between brittle and flexible finishes. if i consider stucco to be a brittle finish i am hard pressed to get a 2x4 framed wall to work for even single story applications. for those of you in other parts of country with higher wind speeds, how are you handling the deflection criteria?
are you talking about the 2004 fbc? i'm looking at the draft version table 1604.3. it shows l/240 for brittle finishes. that isn't that bad really. plus you have footnote "f" that states you can multiply the wind load by 0.7 for deflection. does it still not work? i'm in orlando by the way.
most wood frame buildings here in wisconsin use 2 x 6 walls, in order to get enough insulation in them. so it is not a problem. but i have done some projects where 2 x 4's are used, and yes, it can be difficult to control deflection. i would follow ucfse's advice. also, make sure you are using the correct component and cladding load, based on a tributary area equal to the height of the stud times 1/3 the height of the stud.
daveatkins
yep. have taken 0.7 reduction and used appropriate area for getting c&c load. 2x4 spf #2 just does not get you far with the l/240 limit.
would one be able to take composite action from the wood sheathing to increase the moment of inertia? nailing of the sheathing to the stud would need to be a consideration.
i believe you can use the osb to create a "t" section. keep in mind the stud, by itself, must resist the axial force and bending, because the osb will have horizontal joints which are not tied together. but in between these horizontal joints, the osb will stiffen the stud.
daveatkins
sometimes building specs specify that you cannot use composite action when checking deflection. you should verify that if you can. can you take the height of the sole plate and top plate out of the height of the stud? if you have done all your loads correct and everything and it still doesn't work just reduce the spacing. all you can do is all you can do.
where can this draft version be viewed?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
retaining wall failure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:38 PM
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
cross bracing within steel stud wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 03:57 PM
brick cladding deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:56 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多