几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:36 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 slender monorail beam

slender monorail beam
we have a monorail for a couple of tons lifting capacity. the beam is s250x35 the span is about 18ft, the maximumn slenderness ratio is therefore 240+/- (no lateral bracing other than at the ends). the design engineer ignored the ratio and simply considered it as a beam.
can someone advise if there is a concern for the typical limit of 200? can monorail be treated as beam-column as well since there is 25% impact load (axial foce).
thanks in advance.
if i understand your post right, you have a beam spanning over a horizontal distance, but are trying to apply column slenderness ratios to it. the column slenderness ratios don't directly apply to it unless it is somehow loaded in compression rather than bending. in aisc asd or aisc lrfd, there are equations and charts for load capacity or allowable stress for different lengths of unstiffened beams, and those are what you need to refer to.
if this is a column supporting the crane, then refer to the column design formulas or charts in the above. see the commentary for effective length guidelines.
note that the slenderness limit of 200 is a recommendation, not a requirement, as noted in the aisc (usa). if you are using a different design code, there may be a similar clause or even one more strict. the catch is that if you exceed a slenderness of 200, then you're on your own as far as whether the design equations work. when you go past the slenderness recommendations in the code, some of the assumptions used to derive those equations become less valid.
if you are concerned, you might try talking to your supervisor or the engineer who did the design.
the beam mentioned seems close to a s10x25.4, with the loads and span given in the original text and assuming horizontal alignment of the beam gives allowable stress of 12.7 ksi. the maximum load of two ton will cause flexural bending stresses of 8.7 ksi times whatever impact factor you impose. seems sufficient for impact factor of 33%-45%.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
question regarding floor support beam installation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:58 PM
help with composite beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:15 PM
cross beam bolted connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 03:55 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:01 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多