几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:23 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seatwall design

seatwall design
i have been asked by the site civil engineer on a project that our office is working on to design something called a seatwall. basically what it is (from existing details) is a 16" wide retaining wall that extends 3'-6" below grade on the low side of the wall. the difference in grades that i have on this wall is approximately 2'-6" from the low side to the high side. in other words, my wall is 6'-0' high with 2'-6" of the wall visible.
the civil engineer wants to construct another one of these walls on the site and has asked me to look at the design. the existing wall does not have a footing, but i am not sure how the original designer justified that the wall works. when i look at overturning of the wall like i would a retaining wall, the overturning moment is larger than the resisting moment. i want to put a footing on the wall, but according to the civil engineer the owner doesn't have enough money for this. i am wondering if there is another way to look at this, like a sheet pile wall or something. i am not going to compromise what i think the right thing is to do, but i am curious if any of you have run into a case like this or have any suggestions. any help would be appreciated. thank you.
i would think its behavior is just like that of a sheet pile wall. when you look at overturning, the mistake is that one assumes the rotation point at the bottom of the wall (like it is for a traditional cantilever retaining wall). for sheet pile walls, the rotation point is some distance up the wall from the bottom.
you can use sheet pile wall design techniques on this.
thanks, jae.
i ran some numbers using sheet pile wall calculations and got a embed depth of 3.3', which matches up well with the existing plans showing 3'-6". that must be the design technique the original designer used.
have you gone to the existing site to observe the wall and see how well it has performed? that might help clue you in to how well the design as worked so far.
when you look at the sheet pile equations, check to see if they assume a flexible or rigid wall. that will affect your calculations some what, though for a short wall like this it may only be an academic point.
we have visited the site, and the wall is performing just fine.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
relevancy of code date-opinions sough huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:51 PM
reinforced concrete building design step-by-step huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:12 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
calculations personal tool or public record huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:23 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多