几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 07:01 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ringwall foundations

ringwall foundations
i am designing a ringwall foundation for an above ground tank. i am not sure how to find the max bearing pressure on the soil due to the weight and moment of the tank. there is an equation in the api 650 which is what i am using for the design. the eqn is as follows (1.273mrw/d^2)-(wt(1-.4av)
where mrw is the moment at the ringwall surface.
d is the diameter of the tank.
wt is the line load from the tank shell and roof
av is vertical seismic pressure.
is this the correct equation to use to find the max soil pressure? is there any other approach? why doesn't this equation take into account the wight of the product inside the tank?
your help is appreciated,
~miguel diaz e.i.t.
i reread my api 650 looking for the formula cited without success, (api standard 650, tenth edition, november 1998, addendum 1 & 2, november 2001). the soil pressure beneath the ring is: weight of wall and roof divided by the area of the concrete circumfrence ,pressure of the concrete foundation , area of floor over the foundation times the fluid pressure when full, the moment due to wind or seismic divided by the anular moment of inertia times the distance from the centroid.
the eqn can be found on api 650 tenth edition addendum 1,2,3,4 page e-13 just below section e.6.2.1.2 this eqn is to find the tension in the anchor bolts so i figured that if instead of subtracting i added the pressure due to the shell line load and the pressure due to seismic effects then i would get a number for compression and to this number i would add the pressure due to the foundation weight.
i couldn't comment on the equation as i haven't used it before.
however,unless your tank botom is specifically designed to carry the load to the wall/foundation (a rare case), the ring wall foundation usually only supports the tank shell and its roof. the weight of the content is carried by the fill/soil material directly below (usually sloped to account for settlement).
you should consider the following load combinations:
1. selfweight + wind (tank empty)
2. tank full during earthquake.
now you can perform simple hand calculation to get the max/min bearing pressures.
using api 650 (by the way the 11th edition is out) you can determine the pressure at the bottom of the shell from wind and earthquake loads. these would add to dead, live and liquid loads to get toe pressure. api 650 also has load combinations in appendix r (i think it is r) to help you combine load cases.
why a ringwall anyway?
i am using a ring wall because we have limited space and a square or octagonal foundations are too big for the space alloted.
why use a foundation at all? ringwall or octagonal or square.
civilperson - my point exactly. what is wrong with putting the tank on a granular "foundation pad"? no structural foundation needed.
in some cases, the design can get rather involved.
the anchor bolt equation does not include weight of the contents because they figure that you'll load the anchor bolts without significant movement of the shell, which will not allow any uplift resistance from the contents on the bottom plate. when you're figuring loads on a ringwall, the liquid directly over the ringwall will be included in the design, though.
ringwalls can usually be sized using p/a +/- mc/i. the design either needs to preclude uplift or include it in the design, and needs to meet allowable bearing criteria.
why to use a ringwall- for a more stable foundation, basically the same reason you'd put a concrete slab under your house instead of building it on gravel.

i agree with bigh. why use the ringwall??
i can think of many instances where a ringwall is useful or required. so far, there has been nothing in the problem description which would indicate to me that a ringwall would add anything to the structure, except cost.
there are thousands of large, significant tanks without concrete foundations. there are thousands of smaller tanks here in western colorado alone without concrete foundations. i know of cases where the ringwall contributed to distress after differential settlement. actually figuring the applied loads to a ringwall and making the system work properly is a real chore, as this post illustrates.
why use the ringwall??
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
oil storage tank foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:59 PM
manual design of sagballrod mill foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:18 PM
garage foundations using treated materials huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:25 PM
design of foundations for dynamic loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:39 PM
design build pemb foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:14 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多