几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:39 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 retaining wall frost protection

retaining wall frost protection
i am looking to see if there are any requirements for providing frost protection for isolated retaining walls. i can only find requirements in the ibc for foundations and footings however, i'm not sure if i would classify an isolated retaining wall as a foundation or footing.
so, does the code require me to provide frost protection for an isolated retaining wall?

if it is a rigid (poured concrete or reinforced block), the prudent thing to do it get the footing deep and have an excessive amount of drainage and backfill control.
if it is a segmental retaining wall (non-rigid), the movement can be accepted without structural or visual problems, the depth is not as important, but drainage is still a big item.
dick
my geotech used to remind me - there are three essential factors for frost heave to occur: 1. water, 2. capillary path, 3. freezing temperature. if you can eliminate any one of these factors, heave would not occur.
in my humble opinion (which does not agree with the official engineering opinion in my professional association), an isolated retaining wall should be permitted to move freely with the ground around it. who cares if it heaves? as long as it is not attached to something which must not heave.
i don't have any objection to burying the retaining wall footing deep in the ground (in my area that would be about eight feet in order to avoid frost heaving). but the cost of doing so would be exorbitant and would have, in my opinion, no merit or even slight advantage. retaining walls which move with the surrounding soil are not perceived to move. most people would swear on a stack of bibles that they did not move. the fact is that they did move, but so did the rest of the ground around them so the relative movement was not perceptible.
my practice in a very cold area of canada has always been to separate retaining walls from buildings...then to allow them to heave with the soil around them. so far, this philosophy has not got me into any trouble. but who knows about the future? things could change. after all, i'm only 75 years old. even though i am retired, there are still a number of projects which could end up being problematic if my philosophy is wrong.
best regards,
ba
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
retaining wall failure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:38 PM
moment transfer at base of retaining wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:02 PM
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
cantilever retaining wall or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:39 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:47 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多