几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 04:06 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 r=3 and steel design

r=3 and steel design
i have gotten into the habit of performing my lateral analysis of buildings with the response modification coefficient = 3, which falls under the "structural systems not specifically detailed for seismic resistance" of the ibc code (table 1617.6.2).
my question is, since i have to develop seismic and wind lateral forces and apply them to the the building per asce 7 guidelines, how does using r = 3 help me when i design a steel building.
i am having difficulty in remembering what using r=3 helps me to avoid in terms of the aisc specification, and i can not seem to find it within either the ibc or aisc codes.
find a job or post a job opening
special seismic detailing is what you can avoid. with r=3 you design it just like you would design any other building
it gets you out of having to do all of the seismic detailing required for r>3. see the seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. we do the same thing to get out of the detailing.
i went back and dug into my design information and found what i was looking for. page 6.1-15 of the aisc seismic provisions for structural steel buildings states, "when the seismic resonse modification coefficient, r, is taken as 3 or less, the structure is not required to satisfy these provisions, unless specifically required by the applicable building code.
it further states, in the "user note" that designing with r=3 is generally restricted to sdc a, b, or c.
thanks for your responses.
yes, use r=3 whenever possible.
marinaman,
the trade off with a steel moment-resting frame system, which can have a r value of from 3 to 8 depending on how you design & detail the system, is to balance the increased seismic loads from using r=3 with the 2.67 times larger loads (8 divided by 3). the r=3 system require larger members and different connections than the r=8 system. the r=8 system may or may not require more engineering time and cost.
of course, if you practice in an area of the country that has a lower ss & s1 then the seismic loads might not govern the design so you are ok.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
most valuable steel design textbook huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:17 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
buried steel pipe design criteria huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:57 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多