几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 03:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 nds diaphragm factor, cdi

nds diaphragm factor, cdi
i was going through all the factors that you can apply to allowable lateral design values for single shear connections and noticed the diaphragm factor, cdi. i've never used this factor before and thought i'd take a look into it, but now i'm slightly confused.
table 10.3.1 on page 58 of the 2005 nds shows that for a dowel-type fastener a diaphragm factor can be applied and to refer to chapter 11 for more info on the factor. in chapter 11, the blurb under diaphragm factor reads:
"when nails or spikes are used in diaphragm construction, reference lateral design values, z, shall be multiplied by the diaphragm factor, cdi = 1.1."
from that, i assume that table 10.3.1 was incorrectly printed and that this factor is only supposed to be used for nails and spikes (even though table 10.3.1 shows that it can't be used for nails and spikes)
am i correct in my assumption? anyone know the intent behind this cdi factor? is it just an allowance for redundancy? now if my assumption is wrong and it is able to be used for bolts, would a tension chord splice be considered as part of the diaphragm?
table 10.3.1 refers to lateral loadsfff"> on the upper portion of the table (where it says "dowel-type fasteners". dowel-type fasteners include nails and spikes.
the lower portion of the table lists most of the dowel-type fasteners separately under the withrawalfff"> section.
so cdi does apply to lateral loads on dowel-type fasteners that include nails.
so i see no conflict.

not applicable to tension chord splice. see the breyer text, he has a pretty good explanation on the adjustment factor. it is not used very often because the diaphragm capacity tables in the ibc are based on testing and most pull capacity values directly of the charts, usually not a need to manually calculate diaphragm capacity based on individual fastener capacity.
thank you! i looked at the breyer text and it seems pretty straightforward now.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
nds connection lateral design values huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:47 PM
load spreading in wood diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:11 AM
flexible diaphragm why analyze as simple span huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:28 PM
flexible diaphragm and rotation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:28 PM
2005 nds huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:28 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:11 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多