几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:17 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 max.allowable width of flange in box girders

max.allowable width of flange in box girders
what is the maximum allowable width of flange between the two webs of a box girder forordinary mild steel plates and manual welding such that the entire width can be used to calculate section properties?
find a job or post a job opening
what design code governs your design?
i am not sure the answer is straightforward. it will certainly depend on the code used, but it should be related to flange and web thicknesses and flange stiffeners, both transverse and longitudinal.
more than the maximum width of flange, the important issue should be the effective width of flange, and shear lag calculations will give you that.
jmiec,
the code to be used in this case is indian code is:800-86.
it doesn't clearly mention the requirements for box girder in detail. for single web the maximum flange outstand is given as 16t.doubling it for box girder for flange between two webs , it comes out to be 32t where t is flange thickness. however in crane girders having box section i routinely find flange widths close to 50t.thats the reason i want to find if in some reference this requirement is clearly mentioned?
our old steel code limited the b/t ratio for unstiffened i shapes to 95/fy1/2, where fy is in ksi. for carbon steels, this corresponds to your width limit of 16t.
for box sections, the limit was 238/fy1/2. as you can see, the limit for box sections is more than double the limit for i shapes. the thinking is that a plate stiffened along two edges is less susceptilbe to buckling than a plate stiffened along one edge and free at the other.
a b/t ratio of 50 seems to be will into the range where the effective width should be reduced.
jmiec
can you please give the details of your code
the old code i'm referencing is the 9th edition of the steel construction manual, published by the american institute of steel construction. it has been replaced by later codes, with similar, more sophisticated provisions for b/t ratios.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
load applied to lower flange of beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:57 AM
effective width of concrete flange with radial steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:44 PM
bottom loaded wide flange huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:30 PM
aci318, t-beam, width of slab effective as a t-beam flange huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:04 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:52 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多