几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:30 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 i-35w collapse

i-35w collapse
the first report from the public hearing:
under design? is that an isolate case (by one design firm and state dot), or it is a standard practice/detail adopt by many states/institutions? any comments?
underdesign is not a standard, it's a mistake.
i have long list of questions for ntsb to single out the "undersign" as the sole cause after it (the bridge) has been there for a long while. hello, bridge designers?
we need to look at the report. it could be possible that it was a fatigue failure. the gusset plate would be category d.
it would be interesting to see the report. looking at the collapse video at the time, the failure seemed to be quite symetrical. that is one of the things i do not understand. if the gusset plate 'went' i would have expected a non symetrical failure
all we can do is look at the actual report before making any engineering opinions. a yahoo report is really not proven to be accurate and the headline may not be accurate.
the collapse seemed to be somewhat symetrical, but the other elements may have tied things together in the short term until the similar conditions/weak pints were triggered.
dick
the preliminary reports issued earlier this year by the ntsb identified these same gusset as being underdesigned. it was not just one gusset, but rather at the same location on each side of each of the trusses. the plates were shown 1/2" thick, when they should have been considerably thicker. no design calculations were found for these gussets. likely a drafting error, not found in the checking process.
a successful design of the gusset plate could be made using 1/2" thick plates, if the other dimensions were correctly proportioned. (thickness is only one part of steel area calculation.)
i can't believe that actual gusset thicknesses were not checked over the years especially with inspections and urs report using lsd. again as noted elsewhere, the bearings may be the culprit.
in my reading of the urs report, i could find no mention of checking the gussets. i could have missed it, as the report is quite long.
in this bridge, to memory the gusset plate thicknesses varied from 1/2" to about 1 1/2". the ones which failed were some of the most heavily loaded, and were 1/2".
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
disproportionate collapse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:57 PM
disproportionate collapse - masonryhollow core huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:57 PM
another roof collapse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:17 PM
another crane collapse in nyc huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:14 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:10 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多