几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:44 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 hairpin reinforcement for anchors in concrete

hairpin reinforcement for anchors in concrete
i am working on a project with hundreds of embedment plates that are anchored using either nelson studs or deformed wire. i was tasked with designing some sort of reinforcement to avoid a concrete breakout failure when the embedment is near an opening or free edge. my design uses #5 or #6 hairpins that enclose each row of anchors and extend beyond the shear breakout cone into the concrete wall/slab by a distance of ld, measured from the furthest row of anchors from the free edge.
my concern is that there is not a whole lot of literature that i have seen that deals with this sort of anchor reinforcment scheme. aci 318 touches on it, and i have seen a few experimental studies and research, but with mixed results.
i was wondering if anyone had any practical design or construction experience with this. i do not like the idea of designing something based on theory alone, and i've been told that running our own physical tests is not an option in this company. when i asked the senior engineers what their experience has been with reinforcing anchors near an edge, they simply said that they avoided placing embedments near a free edge in the first place. they all consider my design to be a sound one, but as a first-year green engineer, i'd feel a lot more comfortable if i heard someone say "yes, i've done this before, and it works".
any insights or advice will be very much appreciated
check out our whitepaper library.
look for metal building system details. hairpins are common in that case. also, google a book by
are you talking about hairpins in plan (in a slab-on-grade), as ucfse is describing, or vertical hairpins in a pier?
daveatkins
maybe i am missing something here but why can't you assume the concrete cracks, has zero resistance, and then put hairpins in to take the full load? sounds pretty simple and logical.
there are not code provisions that cover everything.
the hairpins are in the plane of the wall or slab, whichever the case may be. this is a multistory, industrial building with mostly concrete walls and floors.
for example, picture an embedment plate that is cast into a concrete wall flush to the surface. a steel
jike,
that's exactly what i did. here are a couple of the constraints i've been wrestling with:
1) development length. very sensitive to the spacing between the legs of adjacent hairpins. if you have anchors spaced at 6" oc and #5 hairpins centered on each row, you will have a clear spacing of 1.625". since the code requires 1" min. clear spacing, it doesn't leave much tolerance for field workers.
2) vertical placement of hairpins. if you observe the code min. of 0.75" clear cover from the surface of the concrete, you can pretty much place the hairpin up against the bottom face of the plate, as close to the applied shear as possible. however, some of these plates are 1.5"-2" thick. that creates an eccentricity between the applied force, and the resisting hairpin force. i accounted for the eccentricity by amplifying the force that needed to be carried by the hairpin in order for the anchors to develop full capacity. does that seem reasonable or overly conservative?
bones206:
1) the loads you are resisting seem like they might be quite large. apparently, you have a hairpin around each row of anchors 6" apart. do you really need them around each anchor? the breakout that you are trying to prevent is of the whole embedment not individual anchors, so can you wrap the whole embedment with one hairpin?
2) your approach for the eccentricity sounds ok.

yes, the loads are quite large. the range of plate shear capacities is from ~20 kips to ~125 kips. so for most plates, i need to have the one hairpin per row in order to develop the full capacity. for the plates that don't require a hairpin on every row -- say a smaller plate with 4 studs on the corners that mathematically only needs one hairpin -- i design it with 2 hairpins for the sake of symmetry.
i think that approach will simplify the matter for construction as well. the idea is that i have to develop this "generic design" concept so that the client doesn't have to pay us to design each of these as a special case. i have tried to build in as many conservatisms as possible because after the generic detail is issued, it will be up to the contractor to interpret and construct these.
thanks for the responses so far. i am very interested to hear if anyone has actually specified this type of detail, and any issues they had with design or construction.
can't you use straight rebar welded to the backside of the embed plate? prefab the plates all the same and then rotate the plates as required in place to resist the direction of your lateral force. reference the pci design handbook for design examples.
using rebar welded to the back of the plate kicks you out appendix d. if you don't have the current aci code pick up 08 they cover reinforcement acting with anchor bolts. "anchorage in concrete construction" by rolf eligehausen, rainer mallée, john f. silva is the book when it comes to anchoring to concrete; i have personally not read it so going off of what others have done. as long as you follow the basic behavior of reinforced concrete you can create many different details that accomplish the task.
sandman,
i purchased that book about a month ago and it is a pretty good reference to have, but also too expensive for what it is.
i am confident in the hairpin design, but i am trying to gauge how conventional or unconventional this detail is. will the contractor laugh when he sees it? it's disconcerting that not one structural engineer in my entire company has ever called out this detail
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete roof slab load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
concrete corrosion in partial saturated condition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:24 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多