几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 10:17 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 enclosure classification

enclosure classification
i have a very large dairy farm that i am designing. it's 100' wide with 14' tall sidewalls and is more than 1/4 mile long. it's a simple, very large rectangle with a 3.5/12 roof pitch. the endwalls are closed with a few overhead doors. the sidwalls are completely open, with the exception of adjustable curtains.
i'm struggling how to determine the classification of this building. in the wind direction perp to the ridge, i have open walls with curtains on them. realistically, if the curtains were up, they would blow off before we got anywhere near the design wind speed. if they were down, the building is very "open" in that wind direction.
1) can i call this an "open" structure?
2) can i call it "open" for wind in one direction and maybe "partially enclosed" for wind acting parallel with the ridge?
i'm curious how the rest of you would classify this building.
thanks.
i would probably say it is open for all directions, as i do not think internal pressure could develop given the open sides, regardless of wind direction.
but are you also asking if you can assume for design perpendicular to the ridge that the curtains are gone (wind load only on the roof)? i would not do that.
daveatkins
thanks guys,
i'm not suggesting that i'm only going to design for pressures on the roof. i am going to assume that for mwfrs loads in all directions that the curtains remain on the building. however, for my internal pressure coefficients, i'm going to assume they're zero to prevent unneccessarily conservative uplift and/or c & c loads.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
classification of lipped section - bs 5950-12000 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:22 AM
asce 7-02 wind load enclosure type opinion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:04 PM
area seismic classification in canada 9kelowna, bc0 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:49 PM
american electrode classification huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:31 AM
aluminum screen enclosure to fascia huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:09 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多