几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 04:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 deflection of peb with crane

deflection of peb with crane
hi all!
i am designing an industrial building with bridge crane rated capacity 15 ton. because of poor soil in the site i try to design frame support pinned.
the broblem is lateral deflection due to wind load is very hight. but in our building code there is no deflection limit for steel frame at the height crane for wind load. the code only restricts deflection due to lateral crane load not exceeds h/1250.
deflection from wind load for my calc is 110mm in left column and 90mm in right column. one of my coleage said only the difference of deflection that counts.
i am afraid that crane will fall some day.
what is your opinion?

find a job or post a job opening
transverse deflection of 110 mm seem very high - most crane columns are dual (2) columns tied together with lateral truss
thank you for your help. but i am afraid that the 2-branched column is not pinned for foundation. each of branch tranfers axial load only, but the pair of axial load induce moment for foundation. the system is good only if two columns have a distance from each other to sit in 2 isolated foundation. in my case portal frame with pinned support is easier for design foundation. (the lateral load all transfer to r.c. slab on grade).
i still have a question that what the relative of absolute diflection of frame at the height of crane for wind load is acceptable, and should i use p-delta analysis for that value?
have you considered using the aisc code of standard practice for steel buildings & bridges as a guideline? paragraph 7.11.3.1 (page 5-238, in my copy of aisc manual of steel construction, 9th edition, asd) covers allowable deviation for columns during steel erection. limit is 1:500, with other factors to be considered.
this is not what you are looking for, but there are not always direct answers to our technical problems. if more applicable information becomes available, use it.
in any event, i would suggest an absolute defection substantially less that the depth of the column, maybe the smaller of depth/6 or 1:500.
check with the metal building manufacturers association (mbma). they should have the information you need. just type mbma in google and it will take you there. i pulled the following two paragraphs from their website.
does mbma establish erection tolerances for metal buildings? if so, what are they?
erection tolerances are addressed in the common industry practices section of the 1996 low rise building systems manual, page iv-6-3 (see question no. 3 for a discussion of common industry practices). erection tolerances are those set forth in the aisc code of standard practice, except individual members are considered plumb, level and aligned if the deviation does not exceed 1:300. when crane support systems are part of the metal building system, additional erection tolerances are specified in section 9 of the common industry practices.
what are the limitations on allowable drift (sidesway) in metal buildings?
this topic is addressed in the aisc’s steel design guide series no. 3: serviceability design considerations for low-rise buildings, as well as in the 1996 mbma low rise building systems manual . the limitations for drift vary, depending on the type of material attached to the framing and the tolerance for movement. for example, for metal panels attached to framing, the recommended maximum drift is between h/60 and h/100 where h is the building height. it is also recommended that the wind load used to compute the drift when checking against these allowable limits should be based on a 10 year recurrence interval, which is approximately equal to 75% of the normal 50 year design wind pressure. for other types of cladding, refer to the references cited for more discussion.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
deflection of beam supporting a concrete slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:57 PM
deflection design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:51 PM
brick cladding deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
allowable deflection at top of legs of open gantry crane huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:55 AM
allowable beam deflection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:50 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:27 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多