几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 04:54 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 deflection limits 9ibc0 for roof framing system

deflection limits (ibc) for roof framing system
i know the deflection limits for each member are l/360, 240, 180...for each member.
but if the rafter deflects 2" at midspan and purlin deflects 1.5" at midspan. then the total deflection is 3.5"
is there any part in the code (or any code) about the combined effect of deflections?
adam
i don't consider the combined affects of deflection. especially live load. the only situation i might consider combined deflection would be snow load or fluid load (any load that is always there and everywhere) and even then it would have to be long spans.
not that i know of --- that said - i do get a bit worried about tiled floors or roof ponding on low sloped roofs. also - i suppose a complex lintel system would need a double check.
when i design roof, if it is flatter than 3/12 slope i do l/480 deflection. that is just my preference. i've never considered combined deflection.
if the rafter deflects 2" and purlin 1.5" does necessarily mean it is 3.5" deflection. just draw it. it is like simply supported beam (draw it with little deflection), then drop one support a little and keep the same curvature of the beam. how low is the mid point of the beam? i dont think it changes that much. i hope i am making any sense. i wouldnt worry about it if i were you.
most people wont check for this as the deflection criteria are based on visible curvature.
the purlins also sag the same amount at the eaves, so it is usually not an issue. if you really wanted to check the combined deflection then you would check the 3.5" over the diagonal.
there are a few situations where i probably would check this:
1. a 2 way flat slab with fragile finishes or sensitive equipment.
2. a very flat roof that may pond (as noted above).
3. where partitions or similar are attached to the roof and the actual maximum deflection is important.
thank you...this helps.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
brick deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
brick cladding deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
allowable beam deflection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:50 AM
如何得到MessageBox窗口里的提示文本? huangyhg vc编程 1 2008-07-24 01:07 AM
【转帖】续实例解析socket编程模型之异步通信篇 yogy C# 1 2007-08-01 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:50 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多