几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 01:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 contraction joints in slab

contraction joints in slab
i have to design storage building with 4 floors, 100x100´ (lxw), 85´height with using of prefabricated concrete elements.
the posts and girders are in 20´x20´grid, ceilings could be from prestressed hollow panels (thickness 12´&acute with
concrete slab (membrane) (th. 3,5´&acute on the top of the panels. the slab is reinforced with mat. loading - 500 psf.
my question is - is it neccesary to make contraction joints in the slab or is it possible to let it without? the slab would be used like horizontal stiffening.
thank you very much for advise.
jb66

yes, you should still place control joints in the slab. the reinforcing will serve to keep the cracks that occur tightly closed, but nevertheless they will occur. suggest no more than 20'x20' pattern and you will still get some cracking between.
are you talking about the topping over the hollowcore planks? if so, control joints do not make sense, since the topping is bonded to the plank.
if you are talking about the slab-on-grade, space the control joints 36 times the slab thickness.
daveatkins
per aci 223, if you use type k, shrinkage compensating concrete it is not necessary to put any control joints.
my opinion varies somewhat from those above.
if the topping is not bonded, i would suggest spacing of joints in the topping similarin spacing to those recommended for a slab-on-grade of the same thickness.
if the topping will be bonded to the precast slabs beneath, then i would still recommend joints in the topping but much fewer in number and spaced much farther apart. the joints have to be located such as not to disrupt the composite action that you are trying to achieve. for instance, you would not want to allow them in the center of the span. i would suggest locating only directly over supports or parallel with the span.
i hope this helps!
thanks to all, i agree with jike - the best solution is probably compromise between two points - slab-on-grade and topping without control joints. the topping will be bonded to the precast slab but not too thickly.
jb66
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
construction joint location in a two-way slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:26 PM
concrete spec. for slab-on-grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:49 PM
concrete slab on grade expansion joint questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:43 PM
checker board slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:26 PM
basketball court slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:40 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:12 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多