huangyhg

aci 318-08 coming
publicized by aci, i see that the new 318-08 is coming out end of january 2008. i thought that i heard that the rythym of new codes and standards (currently at 3 years) was going to change to 5 years.
as a structural engineer, i'm getting very tired of getting bombarded with new codes and standards at a 3 year cycle. this is ridiculous. (rant over).
the new 318 advertisement lists the following changes:
ch 1. - earthquake design now classified based on seismic design category (sdc)
ch 4. - some changes to tables based on the new categories and some changes to durability issues.
ch 7 - anchorage and splice changes to integrity reinf.
ch 10 - section 10.10 revised (again!)
ch 11 - min. shear req'mts in beams changed to allow for fiber reinforced concrete.
ch 13 - changes to provide an alternative corner reinf. scheme in two-way flat slabs.
ch 20 - test load intensity revised.
a whole new code for these changes above. seems like overkill and a constant attempt to add to revenue.
but it's the life we've chosen i guess.
jae-
i second your rant and i've only been working for 1.5 years. it does seem crazy that ibc 2006 is just now being adopted by most jurisdictions (which references aci 318-05) and aci 318-08 is coming out.
i disagree with it for two distinct reasons:
1. it is impossible to become 100% fluid and proficient at each code over a 3 year cycle, meaning that our industry is not as efficient as it could be.
2. there is a learning curve to getting used to a new code, when you are learning you are more likely to make mistakes than if you are experienced at using it.
in other countries, interum addendums are issued for items that are of a life safety nature. you often can subscribe to a website and be notified of any of these for a choice of codes. to me this makes more sense.
csd
asce 7 and aisc have moved to 5 yr cycles - asce 7-10 and 2010 aisc specification will be next editions. aci is considering moving to this cycle as well but for now is sticking with their traditional, minor update at 3 yrs and major update at 6 yrs model. ibc is going to maintain its 3 yr cycle as far as i know, so they will only update references every 2 cycles or so.
it's like we are still trying to figure out how to correctly do all the checks and use all the right factors from the version from 3 years ago and now we have to see what all has changed from what we were still trying to figure out.
i say 10 years, and on the decade, for them all (astm, aws, aci, icbo, nfpa, ul, etc..) with addendums only for new technologies that get incorporated into the code at next 10 year cycle. i swear it seems like it would take federal legislation to pull that off. when i took my aws-cwi exam in 2005, about 10% of the questions were linked to new footnotes in the d1.1 section of the 2004 book against the 2001. the 2004 book was far from 10% thicker than the 2001 book.
friging racket. reminds me of the windows98 release. just because you started off issuing updates every 1/3/5 years is no excuse to pump them out for the h### of it. besides, i may be a dark horse here, but does anybody in our business (in non-megafirms) keep a current code stock in their library? i bet the majority of us are a couple of issues back on the majority of it.
i've got all these old books lying around that could be a threat to public safety, i guess. haven't got a recall notice from the code people on any of them yet.
i have up to date codes, but only because i just started working.
i know one guy in our office using aci 318-99 (maybe it is the edition before that even). i occasionally ask him a question on concrete using my code (05) and he always goes back to his oler one.
jae:
relating to your original comment on chapter 7, what's "integrity reinforcing"? did you mean "integrate", as to combine the effects of reinforcing for anchorage and splices?
mike mccann
mccann engineering
geez, 318-98 ain't too bad. i know an engineer still using the red aisc (8th edition) manual.
me two.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
anyone know if they've done anything with regards to anchorage in appendix d? i was at a seismic design seminar last month where a field engineer from hilti informed us that the next aci code will take into account reinforcing steel for anchorage to concrete - as opposed to only plain concrete anchorage as it does now. that would at least help us not have to get so creative everytime we design our anchorage since we typically deal with very large column uplift and deep anchorages.

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]