几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 03:39 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ansi 9standards0 code issues - 2 inch 900 1500 flanges

ansi 2 inch 900 / 1500 flanges
a 2 inch 1500 ansi flange was ordered. i rejected it for 2 reasons. 1) the flange was only stamped 900. b16.5 para 4.1.3 states that the applicable rating be stamped on the flange ie: 900, 1500 or 900/1500. 2) the mtr refered only to class 900. the supplier argued that because the two ratings (900 and 1500) were dimensionally the same that it was ok. i said not. whats the thoughts?
find a job or post a job opening
hi garnet0 (mechanical)
the suppler is ok!
see asme b16.5 1996 page 103 table 21 dimisions of class 900 flange nps: 1/2", 3/4", 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2". 2-1/2" use class 1500 dimension in these sizes (11).
note (11) socket welding flanges may be provided in nps 1/2 through 2-1/2 using class 1500 dimensions
i agree with isthill in that the flange was dimensionally sound.
the problem i have with 900#/1500# flanges > 3" nps is down the road when someone decides to figure out what the line class is just by checking the ansi class stamped on the flange. if it's done by someone who doesn't know any better, they could wind up assuming a 1500# line was actually 900#, or even worse, the other way around.
i never did question the fact that the flange was dimensionally sound. it was the stamping that bothered me. i used para 4.1.3 to reject it as it didn't have 1500 stamped on it as required. as you said scipio, my biggest concern was down the road when someone decides he's working on a 900# line. i guess a trivial concern but i still think that if all the i's were dotted, these flanges should be stamped accordingly even though dimensionally they are correct.
i don't think the practice of one stamping for several classes of flanges is going to change any time soon. so later anyone will have the same problem as "garneto". he is going to put in a acceptable flange within the size range mentioned . the only problem will come if someone looks a 1" and then buys a 6" of the same class.
i always made it a practice to look at the installed flanges in the 3" to 8" range to verify the drawings.
p.s. we had one gasket to fit 150 class to 1500 class flanges.
team members:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】odgimaterial issues yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 08:49 PM
【转帖】nls error yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 06:34 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 0 2009-04-26 02:31 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:45 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多