几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 01:21 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 hread relief

thread relief
what is the proper way to callout "thread relief" on a drawing.
check out our whitepaper library.
not sure if it will make much difference but what drawing standards do you work to and what thread form? also male or female threads, or both.
for instance in the uk on male un threads there was actually a spec (bs 1936 maybe) that addressed this to some extent, if i'm understanding your question correctly.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
bs1936 part 1 is for inch threads.
i'm not aware of any standards but in my experience you call out the length and diameter, plus any corner radius if desired. the length should correspond to a standard cutting tool and the diameter should be below the root diameter. you should be generous with tolerances, and try to use the same relief for similar threads.
my experience with actual "thread reliefs" was with a mil-spec defined by the fed-std-h28. if this is what you are referring to, i would flag the geometry to a general note, referencing all thread reliefs to the mil-spec.
if this is not the case, reference asme y14.6-2001. i believe it shows multiple methods of dimensioning and representing complete and/or incomplete threads which would include a thread relief.
hope this helps.
i've always used the note "minimum relief required to form threads" and let the machinist worry about it. if it is critical see above post by xplicator.
"art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating."
i know i'm opening up myself for criticism: if a thread relief is dimensioned, it must be measured. it has been my practice to state on the drawing "minimum thread relief" when good workmanship is good enough.
xplicator you beat me to it. i didn't see anything in b1.1 but i took a look at asme y14.6-2001 and figures 12 & 13 give some examples.
i've attatched a very rough copy of the scheme in fig 13.
figure 12 is a larger view and specifices the actual diameter of the undercut.
madmango & whitmiregt make a valid point. what do you mean by 'proper'?
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
hread orientation dimensioning huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:21 PM
hread note huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:20 PM
hread forming tap huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:20 PM
hread depth specifying - sanity check requested huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:20 PM
hread depth in a pocket slot gdt callou huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:45 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多