几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:11 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 why do wood utility poles fail above the groundline

why do wood utility poles fail above the groundline?
wood utility poles generally fail 5 or 6 feet above the ground line. why is that when the moment will be greatest at the ground line?
check out our whitepaper library.
because this is where the section is subjected to the most rot. wood is stable when it is continually dry or continually wet. what it can't take is getting wet and drying out over and over. even pressure treated lumber will eventually fail this way.
eit, that sounds very logical, but a thought that occured to me is that trees also tend to fail above the ground. being that poles are made from trees i would guess that the reason is the same. trees probably have stronger wood in the lower trunk and fewer knots. diameter change would also factor in.
after katrina (la & ms), i saw the same 6' - 7' height situation on the timber posts supporting homes 10 to 12 feet above grade that got hit directly from the initial storm surge. usually the home was gone, but the posts remained partially. it was even common when the posts rotated in the soil and the house itself got hit as the surge grew.
concrete piling just rotated. the best coastal solutions seemed to be 8"x24 reinforced block piers (perpendicular to the coast and parallel to the surge direction) on spread footings about 6' deep. - masonry blow-out panels between if the lower area was enclosed.
piles and telephone poles are like a cantelever beam. the inflection point (where the bend starts) is somewhat below ground, dependent on the stiffness of the ground and pole and the depth to which the pole is buried. the poles have a taper to them and the point of maximum stress usually ocurrs somewhere above grade. as others have stated, the mechanical properties of the pole are very dependent on growth patterns, condition and moisture content.
the max moment in an embedded pole is right at the ground level. right at grade you have load acting in one direction only (presumably wind) contributing to the moment. once you get below grade the soil is counteracting the applied moment, thus reducing the moment in the section. the max moment doesn't occur at the point of inflection, that's a location of zero moment.
if you check the taper, you'll probably find that those that fail above grade have a greater taper.
the failure doesn't occur at the point of maximum moment, but at the point of maximum bending stress, which in a tapered section is going to be somewhat above grade.
i like to break my spaghetti into thirds before cooking.
you'd think you could just grasp a bundle of it tightly at one end, and snap it off clean between two closely spaced fists.
it doesn't work that way; you have to move one hand away from the 'ground', and then it fails a couple of bundle diameters 'up', and never a nice clean break. just like when a wooden pole snaps.
the spaghetti flying all over the kitchen usually convinces the wife that she doesn't really need my help...

mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
unless there is a rigid restraint at ground level (eg. concrete slab) the maximum moment will be below ground level, at the point of zero shear.
as stated above, maximum moment doesn't mean maximum stress.
refer to attached for broms'theory.
maybe the ultimate stress at and near the ground level is increased by the way the dirt confines the fibers in the pole. sort of like the way ties work in a concrete column.
a couple of comments...
i agree with eit's first comment about rot - the most likely culprit.
the typical wood piles have their taper such that the top is a larger diameter than the bottom (tip)... although i've see a few telephone poles that i'd exclude from this.
combine this with the fact that the max moment (unless there is a collar) is below the ground surface-at the point of fixity, you would expect it to fail below the ground surface because of a higher moment and a smaller cross-section.
therefore, i'd conclude that the material is, for some reason, weaker at the location of failure. i would guess that there is typically a small amount of wicking of groundwater to a certain height which would give a continual wetting and drying of the wood with changes in groundwater level, therefore causing the more rapid decay.
cms
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
masonry wall with wood supports for roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:01 PM
brick cladded wood studs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:47 PM
asdlrfd wood design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:35 PM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:04 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多