几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 04:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 russed roof design

trussed roof design
hie everyone,
i would like to find out on the procedures of correct design of a trussed roof.
is it possible to go straight into the design without the analysis?
the analysis comes after the design, it is iterative unless the first effort succeeds.
wood or steel? if wood, then you may get someone to run the truss through one of the lumber suppliers. else, as the civilperson suggests, it iterative... for steel, it's a matter of determining the chord forces from ql^2/8 and dividing by centroid distance 0.95*d (as a first guess) and checking the web
do you know any web site where i can down load valuable information as regards to the truss design?
in many cases the profile is established first. for example the architect may want a gable truss instead of a scissor truss. there are also decisions to be made regarding the truss depth, whether it is exposed or not,ect.
the important thing from an engineering stand point is to get enough truss depth to work with. there are span to depth ratios that are general guidlines for different types of trusses.
after the profile is determined then i estimate the chord size by determing the moment and dividing by the center to center spacing of the truss chords at midspan.
if you are working on a heavy timber truss many times the architect will already have made msany of the decisions ahead of time. so the engineer's job may just be to analyze the truss to verify the member sizes and detail the connections.
as civilperson indicated it is an iterative process. part of the answer to your question, is a matter of semantics. it depends on how you deifne design and analysis.
in my work i normally start with an architect's profile. many times i run an analysis first using nominal size members. what i do after that i consider design.
i generally do not consider what i do before the analysis as design. however some people would consider the intial work as preliminary design.
based on experience most engineers can work out the profile and member sizes with out running an anaylsis. however at some point you have to run an anlysis to verify your profile works.
i don't think there is any right or wrong approach.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
snow drift flat roof adjacent to gable huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:55 PM
perpendicular roof wind pressures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:13 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:00 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多