几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:59 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 emperature and shrinkage steel

temperature and shrinkage steel
for temperature and shrinkage steel, is it necessary to increase the flexural steel in structures such as walls and slabs to account for shrinkage and temperature stresses in the concrete? for slabs, i thought creep offsets temperature and shrinkage but what about concrete walls in a tank? can anyone explain better? it is hard to find references for design for temperature and shrinkage.

what about in applications when the concrete is subject to direct tension such as hoop stresses in a wall? i would think the tension steel for the hoop stresses would be additive with the shrinkage and temperature steel.
i am a pretty green engineer so dont take anything for granted. my understanding is that you just design the slab/wall to whatever loads you have. then look a aci 7.12.2.1 and make sure your current reinforcement is more than the rho given on 7.12.2.1. if its less, then increase the steel.
i think gotwood got it right. if you're dealing with a liquid retaining tank, be sure to check 7.12 from aci 350, not aci 318.
a long time ago fy was limited to 40 ksi to prevent excessive tension ring crack formation. i'm not sure if its still the same.
biginch-born in the trenches.
temperature steel is for shrinkage cracks, flexural steel is to resist applied loads. they are used for completely different purposes so be sure not to confuse them. while its true that temperature steel may contribute to the strength of a
absolutely, but talking about the (evolved thread) tank design provision, is there any practical difference when you talk about cracks in a tank, as you don't want either one and there is (was) a specific fy limitation just for the purpose of crack control (perhaps in no way temperature related). i think the fy=40 provision may be in the aci 350.
biginch-born in the trenches.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:50 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多