几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:13 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 stone arches in a curved structure

stone arches in a curved structure
i am working on a project which is made up of a number of curves of varying radii. there are several porches or verandas with semi circular plans. all of them have conical roofs supported at 1/4 points (+/-) on columns. in elevation they are each a series of stone arches, with the keystones falling in between the columns. so the arches also arch out, with the large keystones as much as a footand a half out of plane at the centerline from the springlines(?). i have searched the web for info on arches. and i have found some stuff on in-plane arches...but i can find nothing that helps me understand these. i am not sure the arches are actually "arching", in other words i do not believe that all of the elements are in compression, and i believe that the keystone has a resultant outward thrust on it. but frankly, i am not even sure how to prove that. someone provided a detail calling for tension stitching, but i am not sure what that is or what it does, and i am not comfortable just accepting that "it worked before, so it is ok," which is what the architect wants me to do. (there are cracks at the joints at the ends of the arches built by this method before, that says to me that it isn't working). i would welcome any help.
thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
you may want to take a look at:
thanks! i will check the web site. i have to admit that i do not know what our connection at work is. i know i can recieve, or have recieved pdf files, and we are on a local server system...does that answer your question? if not i will let you know for sure monday, since i am working at home tomorrow and i know we do not have dsl there.
dsl/cable connections allow faster downloads; for larger files, it's faster... my email is
dik, i would highly recommend not posting your email address on a web site. it will be found within hours by software specifically designed to isolate email addresses, and your inbox will quite rapidly be filled with junk mail.
back to the original question: to prove outward thrust, look at the plan view again. you can see that the compression forces in the arch must act tangent to the outer edge of circle. draw a line tangent to the circle at any two adjacent columns, then draw a line connecting the columns. at the columns, the compression force has a component away from the direct line between the columns. this outward compression force must be resisted by some form of tension.
this tension can be resisted by a continuous cmu bond beam or a rolled steel tube or angle. it can be part of your roof structure, something embedded in the wall, or something attached to the inside or outside of the wall. in the "it worked before" structure, it is possible that the tension force was resisted by a combination of lucky circumstances that i personally wouldn't trust my seal to.
that is exactly what i "felt" to be true, and i have come up with a conceptual method for resisting the outward thrust. of course it is not the cheapest bit of design work around. it is possible that, based on a meeting yesterday with the owner and the contractor, this whole issue will go away, since they are 25% over budget on the project, and the stone cladding over the entire exterior of the house seems to be a major portion of that cost...none the less i am grateful for all of the help and information that i have received, and at least if it remains an issue i am more prepared to handle it than i was last week.
jwkilgore:
thanks for the info... not been a problem, yet, but i've moved my email address to my user profile.
stone arches can be a time consuming analysis problem, and costly for the client/firm; many people don't understand or appreciate some of the skills of early masons and stonecutters.
not meaning to belittle the horizontal thrusts, but the problem, for small arches, is generally associated with end support. the thrust is generally resisted by the horizontal shear. this is the reason that it is adviseable to have a minimum 'edge' distance. the shear, in turn, creates a tensile stress in the edge of the opening, like a vertical cantilevered beam. the tensile forces must be resisted be either dead load of the stonework or by reinforcing.
the same problem can develop with conventional cmu wall construction and lintel design.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
natural frequency limit of free-standing structure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:38 PM
mix proportion of cast-stone vs. precast concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 02:27 PM
life of structure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:14 AM
curved concrete beam in elevation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:10 PM
curved beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:08 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:43 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多