几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:21 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 soil boring testing alternative

soil boring & testing alternative
because soil boring and sample testing are relatively expensive for determining how deep drilled piers should be, contractors sometimes drill a test hole as a cheap alternative. the correct depth is estimated by simply noting the type of soil coming up as a function of drilling depth.
is this practice effective? it would seem that much information is missing and that there is much at risk.
i would agree that this is risky.
soil testing in my area runs from $2000-$5000 for most of the buildings i am involved with. the higher prices are for larger buildings (require more test holes) or for buildings that fall into the essential type category (hospitals, etc.). these projects run from $500,000 to $15,000,000. the cost of doing soil exploration is negligble when compared to the overall cost.
if i was in a position that i would have to follow the procedure you are asking about, i would find the geotechnical engineer who has done explorations in the vicinity and this still would make me very nervous.
perhaps your question would work better on the soils testing engineering forum:
soil borings are cheap insurance and money well spent (i.e. cheaper than a lawsuit). i would never take on a foundation design without this information, not even a residential structure. if it means that i don't get the job, so be it.
good luck
if contractors do this they are taking all of the risk for the performance of the foundations. if that is a risk they are willing to take, then go for it. if not, they should hire a qualified professional geotechnical engineer to perform a geotechnical evaluation.
thank you all for your replies. i agree. at least one city in our area requires that a pe design the corrective measures for a slab foundation repair permit to be issued to the contractor. a contractor should not be allowed to install a belled pier system without it being designed and installed properly. the design should be based upon a geotechnical evaluation.
i would not design a structure without a soils report. man, soils are tricky even if you get soil borings. in a case near me, tank designer/builder only took one boring to 100-foot depth under a 5 million gallon tank. the tank is sinking and if more holes, and deeper, would have revealed a layer of clay!!!!
cost of drilling is peanuts compared to cost of litigations and trying to fix structures.
my two cents worth
lutfi
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
soil bearing capacity from n-values of spt for design purpos huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:20 AM
shear resisting mechanisms for piles caps huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 09:50 PM
seismic - site and soil coeff with piles huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 08:30 PM
load testing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:14 AM
does anyone else think...soil pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:12 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:29 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多