几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:59 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 snow drift on very small lower roof

snow drift on very small lower roof
what is your opinion on a very long lu and very tall upper roof, against a very small lower roof and in which the calculated drift width w ends up being a lot larger than the lower roof width?
would you then use the drift width w the same as the lower roof itself or would use a truncated snow drift shape? (trapezoidal shape) doing that would increase the snow drift load by a factor 6 or 7.

i would consider impact!
mike mccann
mmc engineering
per code you must use the truncated shape.
daveatkins
yes, asce 7 is pretty clear on this. you must use the truncated shape.
i just find it hard to justify the truncated loading pattern. please take a look at the illustration, and you are suggesting i use option 1...what about option 2?
the code says you're stuck with the truncated shape. seems silly to me, though. i've never seen six feet of snow on a four foot wide roof. perhaps this is a place for engineering judgement to overrule the code.
we see this situation a lot on warehouse type buildings with small canopies and you'd be amazed how the snow actually does pile up on these small roofs.
use the truncated drift.
i don't know why you find it so hard to imagine 6' of snow on a 4' wide roof. additionally, if you ignored it and it ended up failing you will have a lot to answer for.
use the truncated shape. asce is very clear on this and i don't believe it's open to much interpretation.
i agree.. but i think asce needs to improve it somehow. lets say you have a skyrise and you have a small canopy on the 1st floor, i dont see how snow from the penthouse can drift to the lower roof. only leeward drift makes sense.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
i've lived for 58 years in new england, and i've never once seen it. it's something that i look for, as i once designed a canopy to attach to a parking garage. i used the truncated load to design the support. the city put up some cheap, flimsy canopy instead. twenty years later, and it's still there. it's never had even close to the snow drift i had designed for.
for such short
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
snow drift on sloped roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:58 PM
snow drift on lower roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:58 PM
snow drift loading at parapet with a kicker huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:56 PM
snow drift flat roof adjacent to gable huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:55 PM
determining snow drift load in 1984 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:02 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多