几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 07:04 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 risa vs. ram advanse

risa vs. ram advanse
hey all - i'm trying to decide between risa 2d & 3d and ram advanse. i'm familiar w/ ram, as i use the modeler, steel and concrete programs. it looks as though ram advanse has more options and would be a better program but you never can tell until you get into it and that's why i'm asking the forum.
the price for me will be about the same to obtain risa 2d and 3d as it will be for ram advanse.
i have not used either but have watched the online tutorials. has anyone used both and what are your thoughts, preferences etc?
thanks in advance.
i dont have the experience with risa, but ram advanse is a pretty good program, especially if you use the ram ss. advanse also has design modules for footings, trusses, masonry walls, tilt-up walls, which are fairly good tools.
risa is extremely user friendly. if you are thinking of bim in the near future, go with risa. capability wise, both programs have more or less all the features you normally encounter in a structural firm. risa has better compatability with revit than ram products. ram tech support is far superior than risa.
ram was first out of the block with the gravity design stuff (ram structural system, concrete beam, bar joists, etc.) their software in this regard is pretty good. this software doesn't solve a matrix but depends on non-redundant framing only.
risa has been a long time analysis/design program that is a matrix analysis solver - very user friendly and very competent software. (i.e. not too many bugs)
at some point, ram ventured into the matrix analysis market at about the same time risa came out with risa floor. so they both began to compete.
i've never used advance (ram's matrix analysis program) so can't comment on its features/abilities. risa floor is coming along nicely with upgrades and new features to better compare with ram's floor modeler/designer...
risa 3d is great and prsconsultant is right that risa is more directly interfaced with revit, but i do think that ram has some means of communicating with revit as well...maybe not as good - but not sure.
ram is owned by bentley which is a direct competitor to the revit software so how good they will interface in the future is unknown.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
risa vs ram huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 07:04 PM
risa vs ram vs stad pro huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 07:04 PM
ram advanse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:22 PM
ram advanse program huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:22 PM
ram advanse has a new name huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:11 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多