几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:29 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 older steel beam

older steel beam
while looking through a 1930 vintage building (two story), i came across a steel beam section with differing flange thicknesses. as best as i can tell with tape measure, the beam is 8" deep with 5-1/2" wide flanges. however, the top flange is 1/4" thick while the bottom flange is 7/16" thick. bottom flange appeared to be slightly tapered similar to s-beam shapes.
have never come across beam with differing flange thicknesses. can anyone direct me to info on this beam type?
never seen different flange thicknesses like that before. is it a rolled section or fabricated section?
there is a possibility that this is a fabricated section. your assertion that the bottom flange tapered may suggest that this is an upside down rolled tee beam with a top flange welded on. i assume you are confident that this is not simply an i beam with a welded bottom flange plate?
do you need to do any analyis on this beam or is the question simply for interest?
on the subject of logic - i can't see any point in having differing flanges unless there is something else (for instance a concrete slab) which provides greater stability to the thinner flange.
1930's engineers would have a good knowledge of structures so it may be that they have good reason for the beam being the way it is.
just to confuse things even more - cast iron beams would have a larger tension flange. although i've never seen a cast iron beam.
lppe,
yes you are right. cast iron was weaker in tension than compression so the tension flange could be bigger.
here in the uk cast iron was effectively obsolete by 1900. by 1930 we would definitely expect steel but we are a much smaller and more uniformly developed country. in the us i could imagine that cast iron would still be used in some circumstances much later.
if this beam is cast iron its load capacity will be significantly different to that of a similar steel component.
in my experience, you will not be able to tell by simply looking at the beam. material testing is needed.
there are a couple very useful publications for sale at very reasonable prices at aisc.org regarding dimensions, physical and material properties for a wide range of older years. you might look into that for future reference.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
masonry bearing wall, supporting steel beam, joist, pos huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:25 PM
lateral support - steel beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 09:52 AM
cantilevered steel i-beam capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:45 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:41 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多