几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 04:19 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 new punched openings in existing cmu

new punched openings in existing cmu.
i'm dealing with puting some new opens in both bearing and non-bearing cmu walls. the opens range from 6'-0" to 12'-0". its obvious i need to provide a steel lintel and columns for the larger openings. my question is for the smaller opens. how much of the cmu wall next to the open can i use for the design in order to take the wind reaction from the new lintel. i do not know what the reinforcing is in the new wall. what are your thoughts?
most codes require that you have vertical bars in each jamb (each side of the opening) that extend from footing to the tie/bond beam that may be at floor or roof level.
i strongly recommend that you comply with this provision unless your local code does not require it.
good luck
thanks for response lutfi.
i should have been a little clearer about the cmu wall. it is an existing cmu wall and i don't know if the wall has any reforcing in it.
so, say i put a 3'-6" opening in the existing wall with a new lintel. how much of the existing wall (treated as unreinforced) adjacent to the opening can i use to take my wind reaction from the lintel? wondering what people have done before?
thanks for your help
i have used details where added vertical bars on both sides of a new masonry opening. it can be done. it is not cheap. i also have a detail to install a steel lintel to span over the new opening as well.
i do not understand the question about wind load reaction from the lintel. can you elaborate more?
regards,
lutfi
lutfi
lutfi,
would it be possible to get those details from you? i'm sure adding vertical bars must be cheaper than adding vertical steel
for the larger openings in a masonry wall, particularly in an industrial building, i prefer to use channel jambs for the opening. the channels provide some additional support for the lintel, but more importanly the project the masonry opening jambs from damage due to traffic through the opening. i've also found them cheaper than trying to add rebar and grout to the masonry units.
it's just another thought!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
new openings in existing tilt-up wall panels huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:18 PM
do existing unreinf cmu walls need to follow tms 530 seismic huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:04 PM
coverplating existing columns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:16 PM
cmu filled opening in existing concrete wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:31 AM
can brick ties be attached to existing cmu backup huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:21 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多