几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:06 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 gravity loaded column splices

gravity loaded column splices
for gravity loaded columns (with all downward load), is there a need to provide web plates? my preference is to require them along with flange plates. the aisc manual 9th edition shows no web plates provided on pages 4-132 and 4-133.
i realize that, in theory, there should be no shear at that the splice location, but from a practical standpoint with imperfections in fabrication and erection, etc., i feel that minimal web plates should be provided. i do not recall ever seeing a building erected without column web plates.
what are the opinion of others on this subject?
jim k.
for our industrial and petrochemical structures i was involve, i have not seen a column splice without a splice plate on the web. it is an added assurance in splice connection.
maybe aisc wants to emphasize in the calculation of splice without consideration on the web splice plate so as to make the design of flange splice plate strong enough to resist the gravity and lateral loads (i would always consider this combination, the splice are closely at 40ft height).
regards,
there is a rationale behind web splices. the australian steel institute's guide for design of bolted splice connections states that the web splice is designed for:
a - the proportion of the design bending moment on the web
b - the design shear force
c - a proportion of the design axial force
however, there is not complete agreement in the literature on which design actions are applicable for web splice design.
if you're interested, references include:
american institute of steel construction
"engineering for steel construction" 1986
this reference considers actions a, b and c (above)
breler, yin and scalzi
"design of steel structures" 2ed 1968
actions a, b and c
constrado
"steel designers manual" 4ed 1972
actions b and c
kulak, fisher and struik
"guide to the design criteria for bolted and riveted joints" 2ed 1987
actions b and c
mcguire
"steel structures" 1968
actions a, b and c
owens and cheal
"structural steelwork connections" 1989
actions b and c
pask
"manual on connections for beam and column construction" 1ed 1982
"manual on connnections, vol. 1 - joints in simple construction" 1988
actions a, b and c
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
existing steel column analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:59 AM
equivalent frame for rc column design loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:48 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
another aci slender column question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:13 PM
4 ply - wood column 9i need help fast110 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:44 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:38 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多