几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 12:29 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 flexible roof diaphragm shear wall load distribution questio

flexible roof diaphragm shear wall load distribution questio
please see attached diagram, we know that for flexible diaphragm, if two shear walls are not in a same line with shear force as in fig.1, the shear load is distributed to these two shear walls by their tributary area. but what about the two shear walls are in a same line in the shear force direction as shown in fig. 2?
my oppinion is in fig. 2 case, the shear load will still distributed to the two shear wall based on their relative rigidity, not based on their tributary area. i.e. shear wall a will take twice as much shear load as shear wall b. am i right?
thanks a lot for you guys precious oppinion.
yes, that seems correct. the shear you show as v, would be the reaction at that end, based on trib width, not the applied story shear. that being said, the idea is right.
you are correct.
don't confuse the load path through the diaphragm with the load path along the collector.
the flexible diaphragm will, theoretically, distribute load through itselffff"> in simple-span behavior, regardless of the flexibilities of the supporting end braces.
once it hits the end braces, the diaphragm is no longer part of the load path...the load is now "in" the collector and the collector releases load based on the relative stiffnesses of all that connects it to the ground.
thus, the longer shearwall would take more load than the shorter shearwall.

the shear walls in figure 2 take shear based on their lengths, not rigidities for a flexible diaphragm. you can see examples in breyer for collector diagrams that illustrate this.
haynewp - isn't "length" in shearwalls equivalent to "rigidity"?
generally it is thought so.

agree with jae.
generally yes, if you are including bending or mixing materials then no. i was just trying to be technically correct.
gotcha
i thought that the term was politically correct...
mike mccann
mmc engineering
i wouldn't use the term "relative rigidity" for flexible diaprams and wood shear walls. seems like these terms are reserved for rigid diaphrams.
with two or more shear walls in-line with eachother, the amount of shear each wall takes is based how much linear load the collector dumps into it.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
flexible diaphragm and rotation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:28 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
cantilever retaining wall or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:39 PM
cantilever flexible diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:36 PM
can a u shaped flexible even stan up huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:20 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:49 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多