几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 09:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 effective buckling length

effective buckling length
dear colleagues,
in order to take column buckling lengths equal to unity and use aisc-asd design procedures, can we use pdelta analysis taking notional forces into account arising from imperfections and shall notional forces be included in pdelta combination in conjunction with dead and live loads. if buckling lengths are taken to unity with an appropriate analysis, aisc requires max kl/r as 200 for columns, how can this be checked as taking k=1, or is this requiremet no longer valid.
regards
r.akbaba
k is a measure of end restraints of the
note that k is also related to whether the column is in a sway frame or non-sway frame. this is related to pdelta effects indirectly. when pd effects are included in a second order analysis, we typically continue to use the k associated with the end constraints and the sway/non-sway condition.
also...one more little tid-bit. aisc does not require kl/r to be less than 200. the specification states that kl/r "preferably" should not exceed 200. you can exceed 200, and the design equations are still valid. see aisc commentary on b7 for a discussion on this.
please keep in mind that eurocode 3 clause 5.2.6.2 permits in-plane buckling lengths for the non-sway mode when second-order analysis is performed. pls. also refer to ssrc guide(3rd edition) which supports the same method, but the ec3 takes imperfection forces into account while ssrc does not.so taking k=1 with an appropriate second order analysis and imperfection forces, is an conservative approach due to ec3. my question is directly related to an adaptation to aisc/asd.
chandr (visitor)3 mar 01 11:40
asd chk: fa/fa + b.fb/fb =1, b being the magnifier due to pd. in my opinion, you can use results from pd analysis for fa, b.fb. but you still have to get a resonable value for k in calculating fa. in such a case, you should do elastic buckling analysis to get k. then, from the buckled shape you may reshape your model with initial imperfections and do pd or nonlinear analysis, ie. you have to have many nodes on one column.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
effective buckling length for post restrained at midheigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:37 PM
cantilevered beam backspan- unbraced beam length huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:42 PM
calculation of guy wire length for tall guyed mas huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:07 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:15 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多