几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 04:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 dampening mechanical vibrations

dampening mechanical vibrations
hi,
i have been asked to design a slab on grade to dampen the vibrations of a 150 hp dynamic load. the senior strucutral engineer here says that he usually makes sure the slab below and about 2'-0" around the piece of equipment weighs twice as much as the piece of equipment that is vibrating. with that information, i was coming up with an 8" slab. for good measure and rigidity i was going to use a 10" slab. after talking to our client, he says for a load of that size that they would want a minimum of a 24" deep slab below the equipment. any thoughts? any recommendations on the type of
fyi: equip weighs 5k, and is 8' x 5', dymanic load of 150 hp
for a 5k load i would expect that the 10" slab could easily take it. i have taken 15k loads onto 6" ground slabs when they are on the right soil.
as for the vibrating bit, i have heard a rule of thumb of three times the weight for vibrating machinery.
also make sure that 10" gives you enough embedment for the machines anchor bolts otherwise you might need to thicken locally.
csd
the rule of thumb that i use is 5 times the weight of the reciprocating parts or 3 times the total weight of the equipment, whichever is greater.
for large generators, you can come up with pretty large slabs.
our rule of thumb is that once the hp of the vibrating machine is larger than 100 the foundation block will be sepparate from the floor.
the 2'-0" is the minimum foundation block thickness for 1) room of anchorage, 2)good bury of block into soil (foundation block should typically be 12" above grade), etc.
if the 150hp is centrifugal loading type, you don't have to do a dynamic analysis. some rules of thumb are therefore good guidances, such as minimum width/length in ration to the height of cg of the machine; minimum mass ratio (3 times for centrifugal machine, 5 times for recprocating machine);center of machine in raltion to center of foundation mass, etc.
for machine foundation, 50% soil capacity is the value we usually used.
knelli - you are receiving good advice - thick, isolated inertia block.
making the slab wide and long (per your senior engineer's recommendation) does several things:
1. lowers bearing pressure on the soil
2. adds to the mass of the foundation
3. makes for a stable footprint
4. perhaps most importantly, ensures that the machine's anchor bolts are well within the rebar cage - very important for the day when "something" gets out of balance and excessive vibration tries to tear everything apart.
making the slab thick (say 2 feet) also addresses several of the above issues and, as you noted, makes the foundation very rigid.
soil properties are just as important as the design of the concrete. perhaps a detailed investigation could optimize the foundation size... but this foundation is small and the cost of the extra concrete to satisfy the senior engineer (on the horizontal dimension) and the client (for the thickness) is certainly worth it.
thank you so much for all your words of advice, i really appreciate being able to learn from those with more experience!! we're going with the 24" slab to accomodate the equipment and are working on the rebar design.
are the vibrations to be "damped" really coming through the soil?
pipe and duct mounting can feed plenty of vibration into a structure. adding a few flex joints here and there is not a cure. the quiet side must be anchored solidly in 3d to force the flex joint to absorb all the motions. flow noise and vibration dances right across a flex joint, free to excite piping up and down stream.
the slab width should be more than the cg height in any direction. much more.
foundations made solely on mass ratios have failed badly when too narrow or ignoring soil conditions.
for generator applications, cummins has an engineering manual that gives guidance on how to size the generator foundation. it is available online.
maybe it is not relevant or practical, but can't you use a resilient mount? steel or rubber springs?
um. everyone is probably correct in assuming that "dynamic load" means a reciprocating, quasi-sinusoidal vibration load. but, dynamic loads from say, a flywheel punch press or drop-hammer forge can be a bit different. which kind of load are you dealing with?
hi,
thanks for all the comments.
the load is from a "gas skid blower" but is shown as a compressor on a stand on the shops. i asked the owner if he would use vibration isolators and he said he has mounted lots of similar equip. directly to the slab.
thanks again....
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】mechanical desktop 2004 yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 05:32 PM
【转帖】autocad 2008 vanilla version vs autocad 2008 mechanical vers yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 04:27 PM
【转帖】autocad mechanical yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-27 05:37 PM
【转帖】autocad mechanical 与cad图纸转换问题 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-27 05:36 PM
autocad mechanical 与cad图纸转换问题 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-25 06:09 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:39 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多