几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 beam to beam connection detail

beam to beam connection detail
i am working on a beam connection design. according to steel manual and reference book examples, most of connections are both beams' top flange at same level. i did not find any case with one beam placing on top of another beam. is it adequate to place one beam on top of another beam if room height is allowed? does this arrangement have any structural issues? i.e., stability?, torsion?...
please see attached sketch in pdf file. thank you for your help.
yes, this is done quite often. you need to check web crippling and web yielding in both beams, and sidesway web buckling in the supporting beam. add stiffeners if there is any doubt.
daveatkins
thanks daveatkins, can you please talk about how to check sidesway web buckling in the supporting beam? thank you again.
you might want to remove the note about welding... it's likely more economical to drop in a couple of bolts.
the temporary bracing will provide stability to the system until the deck is installed and the roof beams will likely provide adequate lateral support for the girder.
dik
web sidesway buckling check is in aisc 13th j10.4
thanks all. according to my attaching sketch, the concrete wall is parallel with the main support beam. is it adequate to consider the w27 as w36 compression flange lateral bracing?
yes, the w27 braces the top flange of the w36, but what will brace the compression flange of the w27? perhaps some diagonal kickers/stiffeners from the top flange of the w36 to the top flange of the w27.
hello chencfp,
to carry the comment of civilperson a bit further, the w27 beams must be braced or stiffened at the concrete wall and the supporting w36 beam. otherwise you will have an unstable structure.
if the w27 beams are supporting a rigid deck on top, then their top flanges are presumably braced by the deck.

best regards,
ba
thanks. bartired, i am also concerning the stability issue around concrete wall and w36 beam. it is easy to understand for adding stiffeners according to aisc 13th j10.4. but it seems still need a diagonal bracing to prevent overall movement such as wall horizontal deflection. we use metal deck with concrete as top floor.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam connection to precast wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:48 PM
beam bracing questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:45 PM
beam above another beam - with gap huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:44 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多