几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 02:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 base plate design per aisc asd 9th ed

base plate design per aisc asd 9th ed
the aisc asd 9th ed provides two procedures for determining required thickness 'tp' of column base plates; in general both of these must be checked to determine the governing condition. the two methods are described in figures 1 and 2 on page 3-106 of the asd.
for the second method (page 3-106 and 3-107) it is stated (page 3-107) "designing for fp = fp, the required plate thickness may be calculated as follows" and the expression results:
t = l * sqrt(3 * fp / fb)
from this statement i am led to believe that the calculated bearing stress 'fp' should be replaced by the allowable bearing stress 'fp' in this expression. but in step 6 of the handy "steps in the design of a base plate" on page 3-108 aisc continues to use fp, not fp. can anyone confirm whether fp or fp should be used in this case?
(i understand that there are other methods of determining base plate thickness, as in steel design guide #1 from aisc, but i am really only interested in the method presented in the asd manual).
regards and thank you.
you do not have the update to pages 3-106 through 3-110. i have the revisions to these pages; they came from aisc. with the revised method, one follows the steps on page 3-108. there are not two different thicknesses to calculate. you just calculate m, n, and lambda*n', and use the largest value in the plate thickness formula.
daveatkins
thank you dave atkins,
i didn't ask the question, but your answer sure helped me. i was fighting a quadratic equation to arrive at "l" late last night, and i kept questioning the formulas, and by experience i knew something didn't seem right. i will request the revision from aisc in the morning. i prefer the first method (if i have my druthers), but space limitation of my client was reducing "m & n". thanks again for you help. i don't know if you'll see this, but you deserve a star!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
base plate design in lrfd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
base plate design aisc 13th edition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
anchor force of column base plate by aisc, youll find this huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:56 AM
aisc 341-02 seismic provisions with asd design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:31 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:59 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多